‘Disagreed’ (sweep shooting under rug)

Nationalreview ^

[chessplayer]

I’m nearing the end of a vacation, so I’ve stayed out of the Corner for the most part. But tonight after we came back from dinner, my wife said “look at this.” On her iPad was the Washington Post’s homepage. One of the headlines reads:

Police: Suspect disagreed with Family Research Council

“Disagreed”? The suspect shot someone. “Disagreed”!? Why so bombastic? Why not say that the would-be killer “had a different perspective’?

[chessplayer]

Expect the media to write this off as nothing big. MSNBC gave it a whopping 17 seconds, and it took CNN two hours before they saw fit to mention it,,,on twitter.

[cripplecreek]

A difference of opinion.

[ElkGroveDan]

If this was at a gay think tank and someone merely spit on the guard, the Post would be screaming “HATE!” from the rooftops.

[Billthedrill]

Not only that, but the security guard deliberately struck the guy’s bullet with his arm. Dang violent Tea Partiers.

[Steely Tom]

The shooter and the guard were having a disagreement.

The shooter wanted to take his gun into the office and use it to fire bullets at as many people as he could. The security guard felt strongly that this was not a good idea.

Words were exchanged and the situation escalated until it got out of control. Not much more to it than that.

Now please move along. There's nothing to see here.

[Steely Tom]

Oops. Forgot a tag and a close quote. Let me try it again...

The shooter and the guard were having a disagreement.

The shooter wanted to take his gun into the office and use it to fire bullets at as many people as he could. The security guard felt strongly that this was not a good idea.

Words were exchanged and the situation escalated until it got out of control. Not much more to it than that.

Now please move along. There's nothing to see here.

[Billthedrill]

I do feel that a reasonable, civil compromise was in order here. The guard should have let him in if he promised to shoot only a few people.

[Steely Tom]

I do feel that a reasonable, civil compromise was in order here. The guard should have let him in if he promised to shoot only a few people.

Yes indeed. The guard was obviously being judgmental, and this is what caused the problem. A "black/white thinker," like so many Conservatives. Completely predicatable.

[Steely Tom]

Yeah, you read it right. Predicatable. That's what I said, and that's what I meant to say. Just like Joe Biden and the "chains" thing.

[Right Wing Assault]

liberal : conservative :: disagree : hate

I don’t remember this one on the Miller Analogies, though.

[Myrddin]

If you disagree with the LGBT types, they try to drive you out of business (CFA), vandalize your property (CFA) or attempt mass murder (FRC). What a tolerant bunch.

[Callahan]

Obviously, this gentle soul, who would get far more mental healthcare under ObamaCare, sought to have a calm exchange of ideas with the leaders of a right-wing hate group. He was rudely interrupted by a fascist sentry for said hate group, and sought to express his earnest desire for communication by firing his gun, which he possesses solely due to the evil efforts of yet another right-wing hate group. The fascist sentry jumped in front of the bullet which resulted in superficial wound (which will also be healed magically thanks to ObamaCare) although it's nothing compared to murderous mayhem caused by the far higher number of Romney-endorsing, NRA-loving gunmen that attack girlish congresswomen/human rights organizations, which normal people/liberals find deserving of sympathy, on a daily basis.

I took this directly from Soledad O'Brien's teleprompter.

[depressed in 06]

It will be disappointing to not see the FBI sweep through Amish country.

[skinny old man]

I think ALL of these recent shooters should be tested for drugs,and the results made public !