Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Tax and spend, it's what they do.
1 posted on 08/18/2012 10:57:36 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SmithL

Who would want to invest in California bonds?


2 posted on 08/18/2012 11:14:30 PM PDT by doug from upland (Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

California sales tax revenue down 33.5% vs estimates

Compared to Budget

Total Revenues: -$475 million (-10.1%)

Income Tax: $12 million (0.4%)
Sales Tax: -$295 million (-33.5%)

Corporate Tax: $57.1 million (27.4%)

Compared to 2011

Total Revenues: -$468.8 million (-10%)
Income Tax: $156.2 million (5%)
Sales Tax: -$390.7 million (-40%)
Corporate Tax: -$26.4 million (-9.1%)

sales tax down 33%? That is enormous.


4 posted on 08/18/2012 11:19:27 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SmithL

Let’s see, simple math.

If $91 billion reflects an 11% cut, then $91/.89 = $102.2 billion original general fund spending.

If off budget spending went from $26.7 billion to $39.4 billion then it increased $12.7 billion.

Current general fund spending of $91 billion plus the increase in off budget spending of $12.7 billion equals total comparative spending of $103.7 billion. Wow, that’s actually an increase in spending being sold to the public as a decrease! That’s also how Clinton made it appear he had a surplus!


5 posted on 08/19/2012 5:14:16 AM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson