I don’t understand this focus of inquiry. Do we care who Obama’s biological father is? I can say about myself - I don’t. It’s the private business of the family. I think all we should care about is the identity of Obama’s “legal” father.
So if bambi’s “father” was a communist pedophile pervert who molested (raped) him and turned him out to a life of homosexuality it’s not the business of the voting public?
As it is written : in the Gospel of John chapter 8 : Jesus of Nazareth speaking to the authorities (the Pharisees) v.42 and following. ... Before this silly controversy of who’s your daddy? WE KNOW by the works he has done since selected President who his real father is.Jesus said “ye are of your father the devil,and the lusts of your father ye will do.He was a murderer from the beginning,and abode not in the truth, because there is No truth in him. When he speaks a Lie ,he speaks of his own:for he is a liar and the father of it.” As true of the devil and of all his children.As true in Jesus day as it it is today. We know who his real father is.
Well, at a minimum, it shows how whacked Obama’s mother and grandfather were for purposely sending a 10 year old boy to some type of “weekly visitation” with a guy who was basically a known communist living in a whore house. A vice house know for selling drugs and sex.
Gramps had to know what type of place Davis lived in and what was going on and yet he and his daughter made it a point to send a child into that environment. Why?
Think about it. Who in their right mind sends their kid or grand kid to regular visitations with a an old, communist, drug dealer living in a vice house?
Whether Davis was his biological father or not, I think it shows just how marinated Obama was in a perverse(social and political) culture at the behest of his “mother and grandfather.”
It’s important for the public at large to understand just how long and how deeply Obama was indoctrinated into communism (through childhood) and Marxism (through college and beyond).
It also is important because, once again, it highlights how much we don’t know about this guy.
I was reading on another website that a poster had just come to the realization that Obama was an “actual” socialist. After four years of daily proof, this poster finally thought Obama was “just” a socialist. He’s not. He’s a communist/marxist. He’s much further down the leftist, political scale (the end of it) and it is imperative that people understand that and how dangerous he is.
I don’t care who his biological father is - but I do care that his childhood mentor was a communist. And I care that he denied it... and that he lied about his close association with Bill Ayers. If the press wasn’t on the take from dems, they could look into this.. (on the take - where the coin of the realm is access to newsworthy information - handed out by dem PR firms... ) Today’s ‘journalists’ are stenographers for dem professionals... it colors their presentation of the news.
I gather you do not think/believe there could be any link between a reported biological father and a different recorded father? For me if a difference is real there exists an entirely different characterization of Obama and his eligibility as POTUSA. Whether Obama’s daddy was Malcolm X, Davis or Obama and Kenya is or is not involved in the travels of mama Stanley surely does bear on the history of the USA.
Going after full exposure how do/can you separate the two aspects of Obama’s parentage?