Once again the point is not what its offensive, the point is that the speech had been approved as written not as spoken. They had a "contract" that should would give the speech she promised to present,she violated that, and received a punishment.
As far as the "censorship" drum you keep beating, I do approve of some censorship. I don't want teenage children going to see x rated movies. I don't want any of my nieces or nephews reading the "Shades of gray" novels out now.
I am not offended by her use of the word "Hell" I am offended that she said she would deliver one speech and then didn't do as she had said.
The punishment is far too harsh for a slip of the tongue. I guess you never made a mistake when speaking in front of hundreds of people.
But the bigger issue is the government agency shouldnt have censored her speech in the first place. Had there been no prior censorship by the bureaucrats there would have been no issue. The bureaucrat wouldnt have known that she misspoke one word in her speech.
As for the government having the power to ban what your kids may and may not read, that leads to things like the Bible and Huckleberry Finn being banned from school reading lists. Its your job to decide what they read and what they watch. It isnt up to the government to dictate what your kids may read or watch.