Ping!
What will happen if the parents seek religious counceling to help their sexually confused child? The social services step in and take the kid away as a form of child abuse?
This bill is extremely unconstitutional. Oh yea, there are other states one can move if they want to do this. California just needs to drop into the Pacific already. No offense Cali FReepers.
What will happen if the parents seek religious counseling to help their sexually confused child? The social services step in and take the kid away as a form of child abuse?
This bill is extremely unconstitutional. Oh yea, there are other states one can move if they want to do this. California just needs to drop into the Pacific already. No offense Cali FReepers.
And yet the Science Guy says to keep kids away from Creationism because it’ll confuse them.
Children belong to the state, not their “parents.” Parents are not trained to raise children or to make them aware that the state is the true source of their being permited to live and work as members of the state cooperative. And this leaves “Parents” free from having to be responsible for raising a child and thus maturing and having to leave their desire to be an unresponsible child.
The obvious solution is to set up “therapy centers” just over the border in Arizona. Right next to the foie gras ranches, as well as a bunch of other stuff the authoritarian government of California bans.
What would the government of California do, try to forbid parents from taking their children out of state? If they get any more obnoxious, the government of Arizona will reopen its fruit inspection stations, with complementary immigration status checks.
Decent parents of troubled California kids now have a choice: do they move to another state or just travel out of state when their kids need help?
Will they also prohibit homosexuals recruiting the children into sodomy??
Lieu is a worthless waste of oxygen.
Which is odd when you think about it: how does someone with their head so far up their ass, breath?
I can see this colliding with the First Amendment protections for freedom of religion. As well as free speech. This is just another attempt to impose a liberal tyranny on the politically incorrect.
Doesn't California have a compelling interest in protecting minors against exposure to serious harms caused by encouraging sexual aberration and psychopathology?