[thackney]

I think it is foolish trying to compare Isaac and Katrina.

Katrina became a Category 5 hurricane and was the most destructive hurricane in terms of dollars of damage in our nation’s history.

Isaac barely made Category 1 status and did not stay that strong for very long.

The storms do not reasonably request equal response.

Obama has plenty of real problems in his actions and decisions. We do not need to make up false problems. It only makes us look like we don’t know the difference.

[Kirkwood]

If you are not on the ground in LA to see with your own eyes, how do you know what the response should be? All of your information is filtered through the MSM that is working hard to protect obama.

[xzins]

Katrina was a cat 3 when it made landfall.

However, read the first sentence of the article again.

Also, the political implications are enormous in terms of appearance. Obama blew it off. I’m puzzled.

[Just mythoughts]

Obama is a low life cad to be blaming President Bush for the destruction of Katrina. I can tell you exactly where I was and what I was doing when President Bush tried to get the attention of LA in regards to the incoming Katrina. I am in Missouri and I can remember. Katrina did not directly hit LA. It was the ‘water’ that breached levies, that the Army Corps of Engineers were supposed to have kept updated that cause the damage of Katrina in New Orleans.

I also remember that Lawyton Childs refused to ask for ‘federal’ aid when hurricane Andrew hit Florida, alllll for political purposes to blame Bush for non-response.

These liberal freaks will do whatever it takes to take advantage in order to win elections.