To: nhwingut
Lets be honest, they were booing the process of the vote outcome. Clearly there wasnt a 2/3 majority.
5 posted on
09/10/2012 9:42:03 AM PDT by
Java4Jay
(The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
To: Java4Jay
Lets be honest, they were booing the process of the vote outcome.
Let's be honest. They removed God's name. Tried to shove it back in and could barely get a 50% support (for God - are you kidding me???). And when God was forced back in, they booed. Now, let's be honest.
9 posted on
09/10/2012 9:44:50 AM PDT by
nhwingut
(Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
To: Java4Jay
Lets be honest, they were booing the process of the vote outcome. Honesty is good, so why do you try to divert the discussion to process over content.
I doubt God made any difference to these clown, since most of them don't accept that there is a God, other than Gaia. Reasserting Jerusalem, as the capital of Israel was probably the bigger complaint.
36 posted on
09/10/2012 10:34:43 AM PDT by
itsahoot
(Write in Palin in 2012. That is 1 vote for Palin, 0 votes for Romney and Zer0 votes for Obama.)
To: Java4Jay
Lets be honest, they were booing the process of the vote outcome. Clearly there wasnt a 2/3 majority. I said something similar to my wife. Then I realized the ones voting 'aye' wouldn't be the ones booing. So, while they were booing the fact that it was rammed through on an obvious non-2/3 vote, they were booing because their side, the side of not including God in the platform, was the side getting the shaft. So, they were booing the inclusion of God.
47 posted on
09/10/2012 2:07:07 PM PDT by
tnlibertarian
(Government's solution to everything: Less freedom.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson