Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; Tax-chick

I would think for them to pull this off as a tax, they would have to design a form that would tax EVERYBODY $1200 and then have you claim a credit for having a policy that passed muster and / or some sort of income-limited credit. Otherwise I’d think they would fall into a semantics trap. Then there’s the whole issue on how to document compliance. The bottom line is that it will prove to be so cumbersome that people will see that single-payer is inevitable.


8 posted on 09/19/2012 1:28:45 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Taranto: "The whole point of the metaphor is that if you can hear the whistle, you're the dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded

I agree - it would be a much more realistic “tax,” rather than “fine,” if it were handled on a credit/refund basis.

However, as you observed, “It’s not a bug - it’s a feature!” The point is for it to be unworkable as passed, so that we end up with a National Health Service disgusting mess.


16 posted on 09/19/2012 3:52:34 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Use the nukes, Bibi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson