UH - THIS WAS NOT A PRE-PLANNED ATTACK!. . . . . . . . . .  |
Posted on 10/10/2012 3:50:36 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
We can only hope.
It's difficult in times like these: ideals, dreams and cherished hopes rise within us, only to be crushed by grim reality. It's a wonder I haven't abandoned all my ideals, they seem so absurd and impractical. Yet I cling to them because I still believe, in spite of everything, that people are truly good at heart. I simply can't build my hopes on a foundation of confusion, misery, and death. I hear the approaching thunder that, one day, will destroy us too, I feel the suffering of millions. And yet, when I look up at the sky, I somehow feel that this cruelty too shall end, and that peace & tranquility will return once again. - Anne Frank 1944 -
Lou has too much intergity to remain at a propaganda network like CNN. I suspect a similar exit reason for Glen Beck from CNN and subsequently from Fox.
Not to mention the millions of dollars the networks reap in political ads during election years. Why do you think they try so desperately to keep the race neck and neck in the polls? It keeps the ad dollars flowing in. There is a very unhealthy symbiotic relationship between the dominant media and the political class.
If Glenn Beck had went to Fox Business he would have lasted longer there, but then we wouldn’t have had the Blaze...
bookmark
BUMP!
I had the same thought, but all that I could find were accusations that Jack Welch was in the tank for Bush because Rove told him that Bush would deregulate the air waves. Salon accused Welch of feeding private polling numbers that weren’t available to the other media to NBC, allowing NBC to call Florida for Bush at the exact same time as FOX news.
In other words, there is no evidence that Bush did the same thing.
I believe the rest of it, just not the money. I can’t see any news agency actually selling their integrity. CNN would do it for free.
After reading from your article the following: “CNN’s refusal to air the real reasoning for the Egyptian Embassy protest turned assault was intentional protection of President Obama, specifically orchestrated by the CNN News group, at the behest of the White House. Specific, intentional, lying.” I remembered seeing this 2 days ago.
I thought just conspiracy theory, tin foil hat kind of thing.
Did Obama deliberately try to stage a hostage takin in Benghazi as an October Surprse PR stunt that blew up in his face?
The plan — if you were paying attention — was set in motion at the Democrats’ convention in Charlotte in early September when repeated mentions of Obama as a “foreign policy president” were made.
This was timed to lead up to September 11th…when deliberately lowered security at the Benghazi consulate (and OTHER consulates and embassies in the Mideast) was supposed to encourage Muslims to take Americans hostage like they did in 1979. Only, Obama’s plan was to negotiate their quick released by trading the “Blind Sheik” from the 1993 World Trade Center bombings for any Americans taken hostage on 9/11/2012.
The plan was to make Obama look like “a badass” and a to have him revel in this through October and into the November election. In fact, the hostages were probably planned for release not long before the Foreign Policy Debate (the last of the three presidential debates this year) in Boca Raton, Florida.
This was supposed to show Obama standing up to Muslims, negotiating “peace”, and proving to the world what an effective and strong leader he was.
Only…it blew up in his face and the administration has been in overdrive trying to cover this stuff up ever since.
The only way any of this makes any sense, including the deliberate lowering of security and the disregard of Ambassador Chris Steven’s multiple pleas for help on the ground in Libya in the weeks prior to his murder, is that Barack Obama WANTED a hostage situation to happen so he could “look presidential by resolving it in October”… but the Muslims in Libya went overboard and killed people instead of just taking them hostage.
This also explains why no effort was made to even look for the Ambassador and others missing from the consulate for many hours: Obama’s gang just assumed he was taken hostage as planned and were STUNNED to learn the ambassador was murdered.
Yes....I hope that her website is a huge success. You probably know this but she is the same reporter that was gang raped and sodomized while covering the Egyptian so called uprising.
These people are barbarians and we had better start treating them like barbarians. They understand nothing but brute force.
Scratch that..wrong reporter.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/10/world/meast/zawahiri-peace-plan/index.html
I guess we are reduced to depending on Pravda, some British and Canadian papers, and the Nat’l Enquirer for truth these days.
very sick when you consider we are still funding these groups and governments that wish us harm at the request of the prez and state department. Hillary talked about the bogus video at the memorial service of the victims from the embassy. Obama had the video producer arrested.
DHS has turned its focus on monitoring American citizens...especially veterans, tea party conservatives
Shocked! Shocked! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZT! Shocked!
So if CNN is for sale, then why hasn’t Israel bought a piece? Can’t outbid the Saudis?
UH - THIS WAS NOT A PRE-PLANNED ATTACK!. . . . . . . . . . |
Funny one Carlo!
I have been on two military bases in Virginia, so I can't speak for all of them...however...
On those bases, CNN is the network that is on the TV's in all the "public" locations, like in the clinic waiting areas, eating areas, shopping areas, etc. And you cannot change the channel. Why does our military chose to broadcast CNN's "news?" to our military personnel and their families and visitors? More brainwashing going on?
CNN, an extortion racket.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.