Al Qaeda wouldn't be the only ones who could put together a well coordinated attack. I finally gave voice to an inconsistency that has been bugging me
on this thread.
To: moneyrunnerIt also leads to another interesting question: what group is actually responsible for the attack? The Islamists who were getting the weapons don't have an obvious motive for the attack. Syria's Assad regime would benefit from the destruction of the Benghazi compound.It now begs another question. Were the 'leaked' e-mails today that name Al Qaeda just another cover story for yet another 0bama lie?
24 posted on
Thursday, October 25, 2012 12:41:46 AM by
TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
In fact one might expect even better trained troops for a special op from a state actor like Syria.
Benghazi is too much an opposition stronghold for Syria to mount an operation without being 'discovered' by the locals. I suspect the operation was meant to set a trap for a quick reaction force to be ambushed and tied down. Either way, mooselimb brotehrhood operatives or al qaeda in Libya, this little barry basatrd boy administration is arming the enemies of America, and that is what is most exposed with this continuing revelation on Benghazi. The administrations public assertion is that terrorism is on the run in the Middle East, while covertly the administration is arming heavily the very terorists they claim are on the run.
With this much being exposed on the terroism front, I do seriously wonder just what little barry bastard boy commie meant/was giving away to the Russkies when he told Medvedev to tell Putin that he, little drug-addled degenerate commie mooselimb barry, would have more flexibility after his next election? These bastards aren't incompetent, they're evil!