Totally crashes the “it was an inflammatory video” excuse.
You had an ambassador and communication professional (Smith) who were guarded by the ‘February 17th Martyrs Brigade’.
Were they trafficking heavy arms to Syria? Probably. We’re they doing something hinky? Definitely.
Was what they were doing likely the province of the CIA? Most definitely.
Had people, including Stevens, raised alarm bells about the lack of security? Yup!
Was the CIA looking in on outright incompetence, while literally within earshot of rifle fire? Yes!
This all display Obama’s ideology, long held paranoia and bias world view. I’m sure Obama and his people thought what Steven’s was doing was sexy, because it was risky. Of coarse, a leftist can’t trust rank and file CIA, right? The CIA killed Che, Obama’s hero, Obama is the self styled Che of the new Islamic caliphate.
Again, you can’t trust the CIA, that is until your getting your ass shot off in a third world hell hole and your leftist party friends leave you for dead.
Stevens and Smith were expendable to Obama, but they weren’t expendable to Woods and Doherty.
If his security did not think the consulate could be protected from a coordinated attack, what was the ambassador doing there on Sept. 11....and with no extra security?
obama-”I wasn’t told anything about that.”
Have the left started condemning Foxnews for revealing a classified cable yet?
Of course, we’ll be seeing similar reports on the other networks.... right?
Ping.
Also interesting story discussing that Benghazi neighbors witnessed checkpoints set up around the perimeter of the consulate while Stevens and the Turkish diplomat were meeting. The checkpoint was manned by militants. The Turkish diplomat would have had to pass thru them to leave, yet he said nothing to alert Stevens as to whAt was transpiring outside the compound.
http://counterjihadreport.com/category/91112-benghazi-attack/