[facedown]

Then ongoing kerfuffle between WWP and Gresham.

What bothers me is that wounded veterans seem to have become a "product" requiring "branding". I understand that every organization needs to be mindful of marketing and PR but this seems to be taking it a bit too far.

[Irenic]

It is more a business than a charity.

[oh8eleven]

Wounded Warrior ...
Wasn't WW also involved in a financial investigation about 8-10 months ago?

[redgolum]

Non profit’s like WWP are a product.

I am very careful about what I give to, and while I think that WWP is a decent charity, I will not give to a group that does that type of branding. I have friends who work in the non profit industry, and lets just say it is not pretty.

[real saxophonist]

I’ve read elsewhere that Thunder Ranch has also withdrawn their support.

[CrazyIvan]

Anymore, the more noble sounding the cause of a “charity” the more skeptical I am of their intentions.

[Big Mack]

The wwp is almost as bad as the red cross when it comes to scamming. Looking at their last form 990, they took in 123 million in contributions, spent 108 million in expenses.

Their CEO banked 320K and they spent 14 million on fundraising.

If someone passed a collection plate for wwp, I wouldn’t piss in it.

[Timber Rattler]

I read WWP's backtracking email, and it was hardly an apology... more like doubling down, all for the sake of "branding." Seems like they could really care less about their constituency in favor of their liberal donors.

Screw 'em.