Skip to comments.
Alarm In Tehran & Moscow Over Bushehr Nuclear Reactor’s Near-Explosion
Debkafiles ^
| December 1, 2012, 13:13
Posted on 12/02/2012 7:38:52 PM PST by drewh
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
1
posted on
12/02/2012 7:39:01 PM PST
by
drewh
To: drewh
I may forward this to a cousin in Germany that told me that “iran is no problem.” Stupid Lib...now maybe she’ll change her tune..Germany is a lot closer to Iran than the US.Ha.
To: drewh
When they say “explosion”, do they mean a true nuclear blast? Or a scattering of radioactive crap. I’m wondering because the article mentions a million would have nee killed on a blast and the resulting radiation.
I was under the impression that reactors like this really couldn’t reach critical mass, quickly enough to detonate in a true nuclear blast. That they would always end in a fizzle and meltdown that spreads nasty stuff around.
3
posted on
12/02/2012 7:51:25 PM PST
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: drewh
When they say “explosion”, do they mean a true nuclear blast? Or a scattering of radioactive crap. I’m wondering because the article mentions a million would have nee killed on a blast and the resulting radiation.
I was under the impression that reactors like this really couldn’t reach critical mass, quickly enough to detonate in a true nuclear blast. That they would always end in a fizzle and meltdown that spreads nasty stuff around.
4
posted on
12/02/2012 7:51:25 PM PST
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: drewh
Russia is helping to send Iran into total planetary nutcase territory. Surely it can’t believe this is a good idea even for them.
Wait until the Muslem Brotherhood shows up on their doorstep, armed with presents from Uncle Iranovoskovitch.
I predict Russia gets hit with one of the Iran offshoot nukes before we do. Karma’s a bitch...
5
posted on
12/02/2012 7:52:19 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and over 60 million Americans still didn't have power.)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
It won’t change her mind.
To: drewh
When they say “explosion”, do they mean a true nuclear blast? Or a scattering of radioactive crap. I’m wondering because the article mentions a million would have nee killed on a blast and the resulting radiation.
I was under the impression that reactors like this really couldn’t reach critical mass, quickly enough to detonate in a true nuclear blast. That they would always end in a fizzle and meltdown that spreads nasty stuff around.
7
posted on
12/02/2012 7:54:20 PM PST
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: drewh
Sorry for the multiple posts!
8
posted on
12/02/2012 7:55:13 PM PST
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: DesertRhino
When they say explosion, do they mean a true nuclear blast? Or a scattering of radioactive crap.
Chernobyl-style explosion where rapid and sustained buildup of pressure blows up the reactor vessel and scatters radioactive crap.
Nuclear reactors don't have the ability to go critical at the level necessary to achieve a nuclear blast. Nuclear explosions, in their simplest form, require weapons-grade material (uranium or plutonium) to be almost instantly compressed to the point of critical mass. In single-stage weapons (for the sake of brevity I'm not going to go into two-stage/multiple stage thermonuclear weapons aka hydrogen bombs) this happens either gun style (one piece of enriched material is shot into another piece at a very high velocity - as with the Hiroshima/Little Boy bomb) or compression (a core of enriched material is surrounded by shaped charge explosives that are detonated to compress the core into critical mass - as with the Nagasaki/Fat Man bomb).
In nuclear reactors enriched material is brought into close enough proximity to other enriched material to create energy (heat) that is then used to boil water into steam. In a nuclear event the material gets too close/for too long or even touches, causing massive amounts of energy/heat that boils off the water too fast (causing pressure to build for a steam explosion that hauls radioactive material up into the steam cloud that results) and starts melting everything around it.
To: DoughtyOne
Not to worry Prez Hussein says he can be “more flexible” now for the Russians.
10
posted on
12/02/2012 8:07:37 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
To: DesertRhino
Your posting reached critical mass...
11
posted on
12/02/2012 8:08:58 PM PST
by
Pikachu_Dad
(Impeach Sen Quinn)
To: drewh
I sure hope the iranians (small i used to denote disrespect) don’t find out that the russians are in on the sabotage.
To: tanknetter
To: samadams2000
Not likely that they are.
14
posted on
12/02/2012 8:25:37 PM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: drewh
I hope this isn't another pile of debka, but just in case it isn't...
Mazel tov! ;^)
15
posted on
12/02/2012 8:29:07 PM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: tanknetter; DesertRhino
Chernobyl-style explosion where rapid and sustained buildup of pressure blows up the reactor vessel and scatters radioactive crap. That is my understanding as well !
16
posted on
12/02/2012 8:37:30 PM PST
by
Uri’el-2012
(Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
To: drewh
The Stuxnet virus which attacked Irans nuclear program two years ago was back and had tampered with the reactors computers. First we had wild SUVs attacking. Now we have computers dropping bolts into a sealed chamber.
17
posted on
12/02/2012 8:55:03 PM PST
by
PAR35
To: drewh
Debkafiles stories are mostly crap.
18
posted on
12/02/2012 9:03:26 PM PST
by
RadiationRomeo
(Step into my mind and glimpse the madness that is me)
To: drewh
19
posted on
12/02/2012 9:05:35 PM PST
by
bgill
(We've passed the point of no return. Welcome to Al Amerika.)
To: tanknetter
I appreciate your posting #9. It was clear enough for those of us not familiar with the subject to understand.
20
posted on
12/02/2012 9:12:16 PM PST
by
octex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson