Aw horseshit Bloomberg, you coward. Let’s see you dispatch your armed guards. You first, chickenshit!
Waiting to get mine until I have my concealed carry permit...
I have never, ever known anyone who wants an atomic cannon.
Many existing laws would prevent such an ownership, and these happen to be good things.
History will view Bloomberg as a combination of desperate power mania with a side-show, grifter mentality.
I'm not an expert, but a thorough brain scan could be a valuable diagnostic tool for Mister Bloomberg.
.
Dear Mayor Bloomberg:
Thanks for the heads-up. If I need an organization to defend my
right to own a nuclear cannon I will keep the NRA in mind. In
the mean time can you please direct me to an organization that
will defend my right to purchase and consume a 32 oz soda?
Regards,
Sivad
Mensa would defend Bloomingidiot’s right to use his brain.
Seems to me the "axe grinders" are all liberals like Dumberg, Feinswine, and Chucky Schmucky Schumer, and the biggest axe grinder of all, Barack Sheik Obama, mmmm mmmm mmmm.
They only become a threat when governments take possession of them.
"Rifles", by definition have spiral cut grooves in the barrel to impart a stabilizing spin to the projectile. Our tanks use smooth bore cannon with fin-stabilized projectiles.
I would support limits on extended clips on nuclear cannons
A Nuclear Cannon? Perfect for home defense.
Let me be the first to come out in favor of responsible nuclear cannon ownership. Some of the rules: always treat a nuclear cannon like its loaded; never point a nuclear cannon at anything you don’t want to vaporize; know your nuclear cannon target, such as Mecca or rage boy demonstrations anywhere.
Haha! While Bloomberg goes after guns, I’ll still be able to get my atomic hand grenade!
I don’t think so. The NRA is a bit wishy-washy. Probably because they more money with the threat of gun control than they would if it completely disappeared.
That said, if someone DOES defend the right to own an Atomic Annie, well, God bless ‘em. We need more like ‘em.
We really need to reframe this debate . Instead of letting Bloomberg and the Libs frame this debate by calling them “assault weapons”, we need to label them “self defense guns” and “self defense mags” . That’s what they truly are.
The Libs come up with these buzzwords and make it hard to defend the pro-gun position . We can flip the script and make them defend being called “anti self-defense” .
Nonsense. Justice Scalia has made this clear. The Second Amendment protects the right to BEAR arms, that is, arms that can be carried. Cannons do not apply.
If Bloomberg can even produce an instance of an NRA official saying that the 2nd Amendment gives you the right to own a tank, much less a tank with a nuclear weapon, I’ll eat my hat.
One thing that is sad here is that Bloomberg, an educated man and the mayor of one of the largest cities in the world, has no idea that the function and fire rate of a 9mm pistol and an “assault weapon” like the Bushmaster Lanza used are essentially the same—or he is willing to have people believe he doesn’t so that they don’t understand it.
Well, nothing's been stopping them, so if they "would", then they would have BEEN, and I've never seen them do it, so it must be that they "would" not. Moron.
WOW! Tanks shoot nuclear warheads now? Idiots making up idiotic stuff and the idiotic public will believe them and start clapping and barking like seals..
Oh well, when does the new Idol season start?
Bloomberg doesn’t like guns because they make noise. He’s a wus. He’s intimidated by them, can’t find it in his nature to be manly. The little pipsqueak thinks that if he can disarm everyone else, he’ll be equal to them.
No, you dumbass mayor, you’ll be defenseless.
Pull your security team, if you want to pull our security.
I can’t afford to drag a person(s) around with me every day. I can only afford to defend myself. When he takes my gun, I’m defenseless.
Is he willing to give up his protection?