No Problem! =) Here you go.
Posted on 12/29/2012 7:32:08 AM PST by IbJensen
It'll be just another silly law for me to ignore.
/johnny
Something similar has occurred in the U.K., where sub-machineguns from the former Eastern Bloc countries have crept in, replacing the banned handguns.
Since the penalty for possessing handguns is the same as that for the fully-automatic weapons, the "In for a penny, in for a pound" reaction was totally predictable.
Thanks, missed that working on legislation for over a year. Oh and Ms Senator, on that basis, I looked at your picture on December 20 and determined you to be unfit for office.
Don’t buy another gun as I think a law will pass to evaluate the mental condition of the buyer, and you might fail that test. In fact, I doubt any Bubba would pass it. You know, like, hatred of libs trying to take our guns and various and other personality traits of people who think independently. Disallow conservative people to buy a gun.
/johnny
Ironically and cynically she no doubt wanted the Syrian people to be armed. Defense is not needed Offense is needed. My counter offer I want the 1986 NFA rules scrapped I want a SAW.
My English 103 prof was a fully indoctrinated U of Wisconsin grad and she flipped when I said basically the same thing. They have no capability of thought.
I can honestly say, that since I got rid of my AK47, I have no weapons classified as “assault” weapons. That said, I have plenty of firepower (until tomorrow’s freak boating accident).
The AK beat me up, and having had a totally detached retina, I wanted to save myself the hassle - opted for a nice 357/38 Special carbine with lever action - the 357s kick a bit, but nothing like the AK. I never have been fond of spray shooting and the 357 rounds will reach out 150+ yards and still have enough oomph to take down a deer.
:’)
I've made the same observation, although I think it's a twofer: They'll use Newtown as justification to go for a definitely legal, but totally bogus Senate "ratification" of the biggie: the Small Arms Treaty. A treaty can be ratified by as few as 34 Senators legally, but only if Harry Reid pulls an amazing parliamentary stunt or two. I think that's what is in the offing as well.
No Problem! =) Here you go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.