To: rellimpank
Yah, yeah, yeah.
Pardon me, but I’ve heard all this BS before.
INSTEAD OF splitting us up into groups, why not try TO PERSUADE the opposition to our point of view?
I mean—we ARE RIGHT, aren’t we?
So—let’s DOT IT already.
4 posted on
01/20/2013 6:45:27 AM PST by
Flintlock
(H)
To: Flintlock
The fatal flaw in your argument is the assumption that the other side is open to logic and argument on this issue. They aren’t. It’s all emotion..
8 posted on
01/20/2013 6:51:15 AM PST by
Kozak
(The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
To: Flintlock
They’re not persuadable. They have more to gain by banning firearms than they do by being “right.”
9 posted on
01/20/2013 6:59:34 AM PST by
Little Ray
(Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
To: Flintlock
Yah, yeah, yeah. Pardon me, but I’ve heard all this BS before. INSTEAD OF splitting us up into groups, why not try TO PERSUADE the opposition to our point of view? I mean—we ARE RIGHT, aren’t we? So—let’s DOT IT already. It would be like trying to persuade someone who doesn't believe a .223 rifle was used in the school killing, that it was in fact used. Hard to argue/persuade a point with someone who refuses to listen.
15 posted on
01/20/2013 8:34:26 AM PST by
trebb
(Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson