Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt
The fellows making all those predictions didn't have much knowledge of democracies ~ at that time. They didn't know if they failed ~ in fact, in their consideration of democratic process they imagined a permanent majority would pop into existence and begin looting the republic.

Actually, the single member district and it's 50%+1 long term winning standard pretty much eliminates that problem. Alas for the Founders, they didn't have much knowledge of democracy so they blew it. In fact they thought men of property and education would always elect good men to office so they didn't really think that far ahead to the time when there'd be no slaves, and everybody could read and write.

17 posted on 02/10/2013 7:03:17 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

You can reach further back into history for the demise of this “democracy” (actually, a democratic republic) to the direct election of senators.

I noticed that a congressman pointed out this week that many voters aren’t “invested” in America.

I don’t think property ownership and/or a voter test are in and of themselves outrageous ideas. There is no other aspect of society where “everyone is equal” EXCEPT for voting.


37 posted on 02/10/2013 10:20:47 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson