Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theoria
Gene patents, like software patents, should never have been allowed.

They were allowed when affirmative action know-nothings started granting patents on anything.

4 posted on 02/11/2013 9:28:19 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

I would not confer it to being from affirmative action type scenarios, but more so by corporate rent seeking or capture.


5 posted on 02/11/2013 9:33:03 AM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Agree 110% !!!!!


20 posted on 02/11/2013 10:09:40 AM PST by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m not sure how I think about this, I can see both sides. Ever go to a tree & plant nursery? You probably have bought Rose plants if you are a home owner, maybe a fruit tree or two also. Guess what? Most all of the nursery produced plants are patented. It is listed right on the label it is called P.P.A.F. and it will list a number and the warning this plant is prohibited for reproduction without a license.

It has been that way for many moons. Roses are marketed as “Patented Roses” in many outlets. Commercial and hobby plant breeders apply for a patent so they can send their product out to the vast network of growers nation and worldwide and get paid for their inventions while the consumer enjoys the fruit of the patent holder’s talents.

How is this different?


35 posted on 02/11/2013 11:14:13 AM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson