No, I didn’t miss your point.
You missed mine.
I was told that people were NOT supporting Dorner on FR.
Yes, there were posts in suport of him.
To claim he wasn’t a kook is to support him.
I did answer your question.
And told you what would have happened if he’d lived.
I still adhere to my point of view that you are out of line in casting aspersions against Marcella, until you have a handle on how Marcella intended to apply the word "crazy."
-- To claim he wasn't a kook is to support him. --
Actually, I see it the opposite way, but that's because my definition of "kook" is different from yours. Not to say that Dorner was justified, he wasn't. He acted in a depraved way, indifferent as to human life. Not all criminals are insane; and by definition, an insane person is not a criminal. To claim he wasn't a kook is just arguing over the definition of kook. Maybe you get my point, by now, maybe not.