I believe that the military has used civilian locations for training for decades. The trouble seems to start with inept local government failing to inform the local populace in a timely way.
There are so many ways to twist that statement I won't even start to try.
Who won?
We surrendered?
“Let me be clear: The State of our Union is stronger.
And I saved a lot of money staying at a Holiday Inn Express ... Ha ha!
What’s in your wallet? Nuthin’?
Make no mistake about it—I had a great round of golf the other day! Hey hey:
`Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
You know what? Heads up “sovereign citizens,” especially, particularly you bitter clingers! Guns: bad!
“Gotta scoot. Eat healthy—eat more skeet!”
Your King,
Barack Hussein Obama II
We know what color the sky is in his world: commie red.
More from the article:
Is the government preparing for the possible collapse of our economy and society, and why is the Obama administration continuing policies even the General Accounting Office says are unsustainable if that’s the case?
What is the added value of blanks to these urban warfare exercises? Are they being used to desensitize members of our military to firing on their fellow citizens if there’s domestic turmoil?
Why are DHS and other federal agencies seeking so much of the more expensive and lethal hollow-point bullets, which are not typically used at the firing range and are outlawed by the Geneva Convention for battlefield use?
Are bulk ammunition purchases and LESO’s redistribution of military hardware to local governments connected to any domestic scenarios being played out?
If the purpose of these exercises includes preparing for operations overseas, then why were Black Hawks recently firing over Miami but not Benghazi?