Posted on 03/04/2013 10:19:01 AM PST by chessplayer
It appears as though the days of civility and integrity in journalism are long gone. On March 1, National Journal’s Ron Fournier, formerly the Washington bureau chief at the Associated Press, took to Twitter to express his dissatisfaction with government sequestration, suggesting that President Obama:
Can handle Bin laden, not Boehner? He may be POTUS, but Obama incapable of “a Jedi mind meld.”
Fournier continued his violent rhetoric in a follow-up tweet, suggesting that, “Bin Laden didn’t compromise. Handled him pretty well.”
Because John is on his side
Two can play that game, but that way lies chaos and madness.
I bet this post gets pulled eventually because of the explosive topic. What’s the over/under on the number of posts?
Because John will see that task completed all by himself.
It's just a matter of how you define 'terrorist,' is all. I wouldn't put it past this president, but even if I did we have all the future presidents to worry about.
Because you need a “bad cop” as a foil for you to be the “good cop.”
As someone else has pointed out, it’s about to get real sporty on the ground for all sides.
This example of liberal tolerance and civility needs to be posted and written about everywhere possible.
I'm waiting for those guys in flyover country who conduct weekend maneuvers in their camouflage suits to do their thing.
Because Boehner is too useful to him...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.