Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheers for Drinking Reform - It should be a libertarian’s dream issue.
National Review Online ^ | March 22, 2013 | Charles C. W. Cooke

Posted on 03/23/2013 11:07:30 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
I called MADD once it became obvious that distracted driving with mobile phones was as bad a problem as drunken driving or worse. They were so concerned that they had nothing to say about distracted driving with mobile phones. So much for those health nazis. That wasn't their hobby horse.
1 posted on 03/23/2013 11:07:30 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I experienced drinking reform about twenty years ago.

Budweiser was too expensive, so I reformed to Busch.


2 posted on 03/23/2013 11:10:55 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
In the United States, we treat 18-year-olds as full citizens. At this age, a man may vote and he may serve as a juror — or he may search for excuses as to why he should do neither. He may smoke cigarettes and fly an airplane. He may get married, or he may eschew that road in favor of pornography and promiscuity. He may enter into contracts, max out his credit cards, and run a business into the ground. He may join the military, putting his life in danger. In some jurisdictions, he may run for public office. Less welcome but no less real are the opportunities to be executed by the state for capital crimes and to sign up for the Selective Service. But what he may not do — in any of the 50 states — is walk to a bar and buy an alcoholic drink. This is nonsense — an aberration from the usual rules. What sense does it make to deprive an adult of just one feature of adulthood, and why are the arguments in favor of doing so taken seriously?

Promiscuity in today's sex positive realm of the medical profession and academia no longer "begins" at 18. Kinsey and Reich's goal of sexual people sexual active at all ages is here. Kids are encouraged by teachers to experiment while in school and learn oral sex and fisting techniques as well as how to properly put a condom on a phallus.

In some areas, stripping and access to porn is restricted to those over 21.

You have to be 35+ to run for the office of President.

There are all sorts of age restrictions on things. but the above summary missed a few of them.

3 posted on 03/23/2013 11:12:41 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

MADD is focused, period. You could make the drinking age twenty-five, and you’d still have an abundance of DWIs. You can put out forty police points on a Friday night, and round up two hundred folks out of any major town...for DWIs. People do stupid things...no one wants to drink responsibly. Lives are wasted.


4 posted on 03/23/2013 11:16:09 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The woman who founded MADD left the organization in the 1980s when she realized it had shifted to being a neoprohibitionist movement. She subsequently lobbied on behalf of alcohol producers and bars.

There are some who would like breathalyzer ignition systems required in every car. There are some who want 0.03% BAC to be the standard for drivers and 0.01% for bar employees (including bands and strippers). I think Sweden’s DWI standard is 0.01%.


5 posted on 03/23/2013 11:16:10 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

When I turned 18 Texas changed the legal age to 18 and when I turned 21 they changed it back. Hope I wasn’t the cause.


6 posted on 03/23/2013 11:19:27 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Before Texas raised the age to 21, they raised it to 19 just one month before I turned 20.


7 posted on 03/23/2013 11:26:32 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not really out to get you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

As a libertarian I can tell you that just because I don’t want the government, with the full force of law cracking down on citizens for certain behaviors - DOES NOT MEAN I FAVOR THOSE BEHAVIORS.

There is a role for individual responsibility as well as family, church, and community intervention.

With a smaller government (less expensive and intrusive), individuals, family and churches will have the opportunity to step up. These entities can handle these problems much more appropriately.


8 posted on 03/23/2013 11:27:02 AM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

What is that, half a beer?


9 posted on 03/23/2013 11:27:48 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It may be something a libertarian minded person might agree with but it’s about 5,356 on the list if priorities. We still have to save the country from total fiscal collapse so we should probably avoid distractions like this.


10 posted on 03/23/2013 11:37:07 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Democratic Government Of The Peoples Reppublic Of Obamaland says that “children” aren’t mature enough to be dropped from their parents medical plan until after age 26.

And that they aren’t mature enough to drink alcoholic beverages until they are 21.

So why are they allowed to vote when they are only 18 years old?


11 posted on 03/23/2013 11:39:21 AM PDT by Iron Munro (I miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

South Dakota v Dole was Scalia’s worst vote.


12 posted on 03/23/2013 11:44:57 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sen Ted Cruz is my adoptive Senator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I just saw on The Military Channel, that Ethan Allen was rum-swilling Green Mountain Boy. If it is good enough for Old Ethan then it’s good enough got me.


13 posted on 03/23/2013 11:51:58 AM PDT by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
New antimalarial drug class resists resistance

Court convicts ex-Aptuit researcher over drug data

Meningitis Spreading Via Anonymous Sex in NYC (among blades) [gay]

Painting circuits on skin

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

14 posted on 03/23/2013 11:54:36 AM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
I believe in Sweden that you lose your driver's license for LIFE after just one DWI. I hear people take taxis and use designated drivers who really imbibe only non-alcoholic drinks.
15 posted on 03/23/2013 12:08:13 PM PDT by utahagen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Triple

Well said-if the nanny state was prohibited from meddling into the non-criminal behavior of individuals, personal responsibility and peer pressure would come back into play, as they should-then law enforcement would have to concentrate on preventing and prosecuting real crimes-murder, theft, arson, assault/rape, etc.

I’ve been told the age of consent/responsibility is 16 in Britain.

As to behavior that is not a crime-any adult should be able to name their poison, so to speak-just don’t try to force it on anyone else, and don’t blame God, the society you live in, or the manufacturer if it kills you-that is what personal responsibility is all about...


16 posted on 03/23/2013 12:40:40 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Help for those with drinking problems.

17 posted on 03/23/2013 12:43:53 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

If we can muster the cojones to save the country from fiscal collapse, I predict this distraction-and many others- will disappear all by itself-from a lack of funding for stupid nanny programs...


18 posted on 03/23/2013 12:44:57 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Stop it! That visual always makes me laugh...


19 posted on 03/23/2013 12:47:07 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Old enough to go to war, old enough to do anything.


20 posted on 03/23/2013 12:51:15 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson