Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Murder by any Name
Canada Free Press ^ | Apr. 3, 2013 | Sharon Sebastian

Posted on 04/04/2013 8:55:36 AM PDT by EXCH54FE

Abortion, partial-birth, infanticide, they all meet the profile. America is progressively moving into a new era of the slaughter of the innocents. A baby is born. It takes its first breath of life, its heart beats, it hears voices. Feeling every nerve in its newborn body, it experiences the marvel of a profound consciousness outside of the womb. Instead of being swathed in warm blankets and celebrated as new life – it is placed in a waste bin or on a shelf and left to die. The newborn’s crime, it survived an abortion.

If you can sit back in your easy chair and get comfortable with this, then something is extremely wrong with you. If you can accept abortion-infanticide, look at your hands, there is blood on them. Too brutal is the practice of an abortionist taking the life of a partially-birthed baby by crushing its skull during a late-term pregnancy. That is – too brutal.

Last week in Florida, legislators were told that babies who are born as viable, living human beings – that survive after a failed abortion attempt – could or should be killed if that is the rendered verdict of the abortion doctor and the [anesthetized] mother. Alisa LaPolt Snow, a lobbyist for Florida’s Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, reportedly stated the group’s position is that the abortion “doctor and mother should have the right to decide” to take the life of a breathing baby. No matter its condition, healthy or otherwise, newborn babies who manage to survive an abortion can, under the proposal, face the death penalty. The proposed death sentence is not so much about physical viability, but the burden of the baby itself.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; infanticide; partialbirth
Reportedly, Planned Parenthood now wants to expand the term abortion to provide cover for the actual killing of an unwanted infant after its live birth. It is an attempt to persuade others to call abortion by anything but its real name – murder. Using the term “aborted” and not “murdered” allows its perpetrators to deflect from the evil that it really is – the taking of a human life.
1 posted on 04/04/2013 8:55:36 AM PDT by EXCH54FE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Didn’t then Senator Obama vote for this no less than four times?


2 posted on 04/04/2013 9:00:16 AM PDT by null and void (Gun confiscation enables tyranny. Republicans create the tools of oppression and Democrats use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

I’m surprised it took more than 40 years to reach this point. It should have been expected. After all, when a major ivy league university hires a “philosopher” who thinks parents should be able to kill their children within the first year of birth (Peter Singer), it will only be a matter of time before the actual killings of those little ones begins—then it will will be other horrors that will occur.


3 posted on 04/04/2013 9:12:02 AM PDT by DallasDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Hippocrates or hypocrite

First, Do No Harm!

Shame on us all,
Gandalf

4 posted on 04/04/2013 9:39:27 AM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson