Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
The primary logic for this was because poor people smoke more than more affluent people, and so would be harmed unfairly by making poor people pay a smoking surcharge.

Of course, the progressive solution is to spread the cost of poor peoples' poor health choices to more affluent people who made wise health choices.

10 posted on 04/10/2013 2:24:54 PM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sender

I think the better solution is simply to mandate that tobacco in a cigarette can only be raw tobacco....no preservatives or chemicals added. Once you do that....quitting becomes fairly easily.


12 posted on 04/10/2013 3:07:09 PM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson