Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So much for the oath of office...........
1 posted on 04/24/2013 1:58:37 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Sub-Driver

McCain, McGraham, McRubio, McFlake, McPaul, McRyan, McConnell, McBoehner, et al, call your offices!! We don’t need any new laws. Your dear Marxist/fascist idiot leader laughs in your clown faces!! He and Butch Napolitano will tell YOU which laws HE will decide to enforce. Mostly his own. You diddle with meaningless twaddle while America burns!!


32 posted on 04/24/2013 2:13:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The The People can pick which ones to obey. Can’t have it both ways.


37 posted on 04/24/2013 2:13:49 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Every penny given to film and TV media companies goes right into enemy coffers. Starve them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Translation: Obastard and the Obamabots are above the law. Which is the way with all dictators.


39 posted on 04/24/2013 2:14:17 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
What this means is that anything they put about border security in immigration "reform" won't be enforced, just like the current immigration law.

Therefore, there is no need for a new law. Or any law, for that matter.

That's what happens when the feral government does not feel constrained by the rule of law.

Soon the peasants won't either.

40 posted on 04/24/2013 2:14:38 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth." --Alan Greenspan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Article VI, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution:

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States
which shall be made in Pursuance thereof,
and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,
under the Authority of the United States,
shall be the supreme Law of the Land; . . .


41 posted on 04/24/2013 2:15:01 PM PDT by Diogenesis (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

“Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared that she, President Barack Obama and other political officials at the top of this administration have the authority to decide which laws to enforce, and which ones to ignore. “

Sub-Driver, do you think people understand how utterly terrifying those words are?? Mike Chertoff felt the same way, but at least the Bush Administration had the good sense to lie about it!

PS. THEY WILL FEEL THE SAME WAY AFTER AMNESTY!! WAKE UP AMERICA, THIS IS OUR LAST CHANCE.


43 posted on 04/24/2013 2:17:13 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Hey Janet, may I decide which laws to abide by and which laws I can break, and expect to NOT be held accountable when I’m caught??? Dumb@ss, ignorant, moronic, imbecilic, lawbreaking Biotch!


45 posted on 04/24/2013 2:17:40 PM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends; RedMDer; DJ MacWoW; trisham; musicman; TheOldLady; Lady Jag; ...


B/S! Impeach the corrupt bitch! Napolitano, too.

11 posted on 04/24/2013 2:03:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)



Support Free Republic Today!

47 posted on 04/24/2013 2:19:50 PM PDT by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
In her response to those remarks from Sessions, Napolitano said she believes she and other political officials have the authority to tell law enforcement agents which laws to enforce and which ones to ignore.

That’s not what the Democrats thought back when Nixon was impounding funds in 1972 an effort to reduce government spending. They wanted to impeach him then for failing to spend money as passed in the federal budget.

48 posted on 04/24/2013 2:20:55 PM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

If there is a petition demanding her removal, I will rush to sign it.


50 posted on 04/24/2013 2:22:34 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

THEY can pick and choose which law(s) to enforce.

Can I pick and choose which office I want my paid taxes to go to, too?

Could there be a check box on my tax form, No funding EPA, Education, etc etc?


51 posted on 04/24/2013 2:23:55 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Sessions should have shot back “care to tell me where you found that in the Constitution?” When she couldn’t he should have said further “You’re an embarrassment to public officials everywhere, You need to resign here and now.”


53 posted on 04/24/2013 2:24:50 PM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
This is why this immigration law should NOT be passed. Border security will be ignored as amnesty is granted.

Why does Marco Rubio not understand this?

54 posted on 04/24/2013 2:25:42 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; PhilDragoo; All
Treason;

1.
the offense of acting to overthrow one's government or to harm or kill its sovereign.

2.
a violation of allegiance to one's sovereign or to one's state.

3.
the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.

I would say she's done at least 2 of those - and not in the pot........

55 posted on 04/24/2013 2:26:04 PM PDT by potlatch (~be content with small victories and simple pleasures~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t even know what to say anymore.

Destroyed from within. Large segments of American society
unaware,coarsened and completely unable to understand what
made this country great and why its all slipping away.


56 posted on 04/24/2013 2:26:26 PM PDT by americas.best.days... ( I think we can now say that they are behind us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Amazing.

Guess what, fugly bitch.

So can the next Republican in office.

OOPS on all your gun control.

58 posted on 04/24/2013 2:27:33 PM PDT by Lazamataz ("AP" clearly stands for American Pravda. Our news media has become completely and proudly Soviet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Janet Gestapolano living up to her name.


59 posted on 04/24/2013 2:29:45 PM PDT by SparkyBass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Wonder when Bozo Boehner and Meaningless McConnell will issue a statement of condemnation on this and demand resignation?


60 posted on 04/24/2013 2:31:11 PM PDT by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; mickie; flaglady47
Why can't one of the conservative law firms bring suit against her for violation of her oath of office....and the Constitution?

Or would the Supremes throw the suit out for another "lack of standing"!

"STAND UP, CHUCK!"

(.....now we ALL have no standing, Joe).

Leni

61 posted on 04/24/2013 2:31:36 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

imagine if we could do that for taxes. We don’t need congress to cut taxes. We simply ignore tax collection above 20% essentially giving everyone 20% flat tax


62 posted on 04/24/2013 2:31:55 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson