Skip to comments.
Study: 97% Agreement on Man made Global Warming (Counting scientific papers)
wunderground.com ^
| May 16 2013
| Angela Fritz
Posted on 05/16/2013 6:38:08 AM PDT by listenhillary
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: UKrepublican
This is easy to achieve when those peer review journals blackball any article that contradicts the AGW thesis.
21
posted on
05/16/2013 7:30:19 AM PDT
by
catman67
To: listenhillary
There was a time when 97% thought the sun revolved around the earth...
22
posted on
05/16/2013 7:35:17 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Jesus said, Give your money to the poor. NOT 'Give your neighbor's money to the poor' freeper kevao)
To: UKrepublican
And in the 13th century 100 percent of natural philosophers (the sort of people who would someday be called "scientists") were absolutely certain that the Earth was the center of the universe around which the Sun, planets, and all the stars revolved. The conjoining of the two words "science" and "consensus" should set off alarm bells for any thinking person. Especially when physical evidence that contradicts the "consensus" has been slapping everyone in the forehead for years.
The Emperor of AGW is parading buck naked and the high pitch desperation of articles like this is flinching reaction to the ridicule the writers must know, at least subconsciously, is coming. Some, maybe most, of them must know the their little game is over.
23
posted on
05/16/2013 7:36:28 AM PDT
by
katana
(Just my opinions)
To: listenhillary
The research, the most comprehensive analysis of climate research to date, finds that 97.1% of the studies published between 1991 to 2011 that expressed a position on man made climate change agreed that it was happening, and that it was due to human activity. If you recall, in the story about Chicken Little, most of the crowd agreed with Chicken Little that the "sky is falling."
Without more detail on the nature of the "studies" we may have a Chicken Little kind of report.
24
posted on
05/16/2013 7:44:00 AM PDT
by
olezip
To: listenhillary; Revolting cat!
What’s the compensation payout when 97% of weather prophets predict rain this week and it doesn’t rain?
Where is the accountability?
To: deweyfrank
"You have to wonder how somebody can write (let alone read) the claims made here in the press release by Cook with a straight face. It gives a window into the sort of things we can expect from his borked survey he recently foisted on climate websites which seems destined to either fail, or get spun into even stranger claims. For example, compare these two passages of the press release..."
Watts Up with That: Fuzzy Math
To: USCG SimTech
To: listenhillary
Sorry but the “97%” number is as bogus as the “90%” of people support “comprehensive background checks”
And even if it were true, science doesn't operate by “consensus” .
Before the Wright Brothers flew at Kittyhawk, “consensus” was man could not fly in “heavier than air” aircraft(non lighter than air, i.e Helium, warm air etc.)
28
posted on
05/16/2013 8:12:37 AM PDT
by
RedMonqey
("Gun-free zones" equal "Target-rich environment.")
To: RedMonqey
You don’t need to apologize to me. /;?)
29
posted on
05/16/2013 8:17:48 AM PDT
by
listenhillary
(Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
To: catman67
"..This is easy to achieve when those peer review journals blackball any article that contradicts the AGW thesis..."
key words, peer review.
You find it difficult to get published in "science" journals unless you are politically correct or a evolutionist. "Tow the Line...boys"
oh yes, and if you want to graduate....you must see it my way......(sarc)
30
posted on
05/16/2013 8:51:33 AM PDT
by
kimtom
(USA ; Freedom is not Free)
To: USCG SimTech
What’s been proven is that lying wackos like to write a lot.
31
posted on
05/16/2013 9:16:40 AM PDT
by
DPMD
To: listenhillary
yes, climate change has been happening since the earth was created - day by day.
Man in not smart enough to know how, or if, climate is changed.
We do try our best, we think we are really smart - but we aren’t.
Causes of climate change are cyclic, activity on the Sun and other factors unknown to mankind, IMO.
32
posted on
05/16/2013 9:40:11 AM PDT
by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: listenhillary
Since the genesis of Wunderground was University of Michigan (same as Ayers' Weather Underground terrorists) and founder Jeff Masters supports IPCC
hypotheses , is anyone truly surprised???
To: listenhillary
That wast a personal apology
But, listenhillary, We be cool.;--)
34
posted on
05/16/2013 10:23:08 AM PDT
by
RedMonqey
("Gun-free zones" equal "Target-rich environment.")
To: listenhillary
Yeah, and 100% of papers in psych journals claim that homosexual behavior is normal.
Of course, there's no way in hell you'll ever get a paper published that argues the alternative position.
That's what happens when science becomes subject to politics.
35
posted on
05/16/2013 10:28:42 AM PDT
by
Antoninus
(Sorry, gone rogue.)
To: listenhillary
Weather wise it is a good site. Politically they are just idiots. The reason so many published studies support AGW, is that those were the only papers that would get published. We have the AGW trust admitting in emails that they were forcing journals to not publish contrary papers.
To: listenhillary
Why wouldn't you expect Australia's Global Change Institute to support global warming. Interestingly, the paper also said 66% of the papers didn't reference a claim for climate change or it's cause.
So they really meant that a third of researchers believe in human-made global warming. Not exactly a consensus.
To: listenhillary
...and one of the warmest times in recorded history was about a 1000 years ago. Norse farmed and raised livestock on Greenland. Then those stinking Vikings started driving their SUV's, and then it was downhill from there.
Manmade AGW my ass.
38
posted on
05/17/2013 4:55:12 AM PDT
by
catfish1957
(My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
To: logi_cal869
I always wondered why Masters called his little pro manmade AGW whacko site, Weather Underground.
And hint to all, don't try to rationally argue it over there. He and his little minion mods will quickly zot any dissenters of the koolaid.
39
posted on
05/17/2013 4:58:11 AM PDT
by
catfish1957
(My dream for hope and change is to see the punk POTUS in prison for treason)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson