No question. But I keep asking myself why? They clearly know better but they, along with the so-called "science press" including "Discover" magazine, "Scientific American" and many others are 100% on the climate alarmist bandwagon. "National Geographic," which used to be among the nation's most respected organizations, started prostituting itself over the issue years ago. It no longer has scientific credibility.
What are they getting out of it? Or are they simply staffed by "the end justifies the means" radicals who keep little icons of Al Gore in "holy" shrines?
Money.