Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad

The last time I checked there were very few airstrips in the middle of the ocean. Also when destroyers can fly then they can carry out alpha strikes for us. But you are right a land based airstrip is cheaper. he problem is the are a stationery target a CVN is always moving.


9 posted on 06/02/2013 7:19:56 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: central_va

The moving part isn’t a big issue as anything that can sink a carrier can also find it and kill it. The issue is that such weapons cannot be launched within 100+ miles of a carrier and multiple weapon systems layered around the carrier can down those weapons. We spend more on carrier protection than we do on the carrier and its aircraft.

The one thing we cannot protect a carrier from is multiple ballistic missiles and the Soviets had created a warhead for their ICBMs that can find and kill a carrier. We created Aegis to counter it, but we also know they can overwhelm that system and get a warhead through.

So, to me, against a country a carrier is design to fight, it is an antique. Against ragheads and rusty AH-47s, it’s perfectly safe...until it gets too close to shore and a raghead State has a friendly relationship with a country like China. Of course, we will know it was Chinese and the Chinese don’t want a war yet.


12 posted on 06/02/2013 7:28:07 AM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson