don't ask, don't tell... right?The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
If they wont talk they should be fired and prosecuted.
Fine. Try and convict all the agents and they can either turn in their superiors or do hard time. In my opinion, they should do both.
Every single one in this office even remotely associated with the targeting MUST be put under oath.
don't ask, don't tell... right?Subpoenas.
Make them testify under oath.
Make them take the 5th.
Repeatedly.
Who or what could the IRS agents possibly be afraid of?
All this illustrates why the IRS needs to be closed.
Smart Tea Party candidates will lrun on the IRS is evil bandwagon. And show the special relationship the DNC and IRS share.
Did someone order you to single out Tea Party applications?Yes
Who told you to do so?
I cannot tell you.
Do you have any proof to back up your allegation?
No, I cannot share it with you.
Again, who told you to single out the applications?
I cannot tell you,
Fine, for failing to cooperate in an official investigation, you are hereby suspended without pay pending your dismissal hearing. Surrender your badge to me and this officer will escort you out of the building after giving you 3 minutes to retrieve your personal belongings. You are forbidden to touch the computer.
Time to remind Cincinnati IRS :
“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men should do nothing.”
Edmund Burke, and others
A threat of jail time may alter that, but it has to be a credible threat.
Sounds union to me.
On Twitter one of the Drudge editors says there is a group of low level employees who have evidence that the orders came from above. Their evidence doesn’t go to the white house but it does go very high in the agency.
Fixing the blame would seem easy. Just start up the chain of command.
Fine. Hit them with a RICO investigation, because that is what this is.
Waterboard!!!
The Inspector General of the IRS was the one asking these questions. First, I don’t believe he has the authority to compel testimony, ie, answer or be fired. Second, a low level agent would be stupid to answer the IG in the first place. You’re asking him to rat out his boss or bosses boss. He’s got to have more cover than the IG can provide.
Who orderd the tageting program?
Uh... let me guess; his name begins with Bar... and ends with ...ama, and he lives in a big white house.
Am I right?
Yes, I’m right.
Every one is in contempt. Toss the lot in jail on unpaid leave and fire every one of them when they get out. Obviously they have no respect for the law and should not be in government service. Ever.
BREAKING: IRS Paper Trail All The Way To The Top Level In D.C.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/06/breaking-irs-papertrail-all-the-way-to-the-top-level-in-d-c/
The answer to the question of WHO ordered things done in Cincy is very simple ~ it was the person who ASSIGNED THOSE 40 CASES to that one employee!
Their correspondence control system should be able to identify that person quite readily. My guess is the person who does case assignment is not a boss ~ nor maybe even a human being ~ this could be done by an algorithm in the programming in the correspondence control system.
The people who were interviewed likely don't even understand what's going on, but if the staffers are able to tell the system what sort of cases they want ~ either by having a high rate of productivity working cases of a specific characteristic (to be determined by the correspondence control system itself) or some other means, it could well be a total mystery to the users.
The IG hasn't done his job until he's interviewed the key or lead programmers who put this one together.
We also can't overlook the fact the selected organizations suffered tremendous delays in getting their cases processed. It's possible the assignment algorithm can be set to transfer selected categories of cases to the least productive employees ~ ....... ~ for the purpose of 'training'.
Lois Lerner was at FEC when they set up their correspondence and data control system. She, all by herself, could have transferable knowledge of capabilities in the FEC system which was applicable to the IRS system and could have pulled the whole thing off by herself!
NOTE: If we'd put together a system like this at USPS (to handle Congressional Liaison, PMG correspondence, Consumer Affairs and Mail Classification activities) they'd formed a peoples revolutionary committee to track us down and bust our kneecaps ~ then they'd get real mean. IRS types are not independent thinkers so they are probably in the grip of an oppressive but very insane correspondence control system which has been misused by the evil arch bigot Lois Lerner ~