Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stanne

This is not a male/female thing. This is a LIBERAL/CONSERVATIVE thing. Hint: Many young girls also play with cap guns, and not all women are femi-nazi morons. Not all men are John Wayne, the liberal ones are mostly panty-waists. Teach your boys AND girls that the only good “gun control” is taking careful aim and watching what’s behind your target too.


68 posted on 06/12/2013 5:28:26 AM PDT by gemoftheocean (...geez, this all seems so straight forward and logical to me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: gemoftheocean

Oh, I agree with that completely. It’s the main point, I am sure.

I am just focusing on the philosophic as I am wont to do.

The libs go straight for the kids and I get protective.

And I get protective about it.

This fight against boys to take their guns away goes back and it’s usually moms. they don’t get why their boys are so interested in “violence”, when they HAVE to have a weapon.

It’s Hollywood that puts the fear in the moms. A boy has to have a weapon and it’s aside from the all encompassing Second Amendment, which should protect a boy’s right to grow up free of gun grabbing, but it’s for a different reason for him, and an important one.

The psychological theory, Jung’s, to be exact, is that mastering weaponry assures a boy’s normal development of gender identification.

And the moms most times let it go, as they find that no matter what they do, the boy will make a weapon out of anything, like water seeking its level.

And I know a lot of women who shoot and girls who are proficient at the art of battle through nerf guns and video games, and that’s very important for fun and for protection, of course.

It’s just that the moms, and now the schools whose parent groups are allowing this, when they frustrate boys’ need to fantasize about weaponry don’t understand that they are messing around with something very big in the boy’s life.

During that particular period of development when the unguided disrespectful adult tells the boy, in effect, that he Is bad for being normal, once that stage is missed, there can be a lot of trouble.

The parents in this case are fooling around with more than just the communist argument of the day. They should have brought the child out of school immediately and told him of course you’re not bad for wanting to know how to shoot, we’re homeschooling, mom’s quitting her job, we’re moving to a smaller situation, or to Texas and that’s the end of it.

But they’re reinforcing to this kid that he is bad for wanting to develop into a sexually healthy boy, and they don’t know it. That’s the theory, anyway. Because they don’t care about that, just their agenda.

So, I am just frustrated in my protection of his interests. and these women and wimpy men are out to raise a generation of men who can’t have normal role identification, can’t shoot to save themselves or their families, can’t get a girl, because, in the end, what girl wants a man who can’t protect his family.

Of course they think that these guys are going to be great at bowing to the Saudi kings and charm the Taliban into surrendering, and, worse, placate our ever more powerful government, but in so doing it is fire they’re playing with.

It’s just that the boy himself is being scarred.


74 posted on 06/12/2013 7:40:30 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson