If you think it’s ad homimen than you are truly lost. I am in no way defending the current situation, so don’t presume to speak for me. My point is using Nadler to make your point is flawed. That’s it.
When you hitch your wagon to the likes of Nadler you’ve lost me. Call it what you will.
That is the definition of ad hominem "to the person".
You think Nadler heard the NSA witnesses wrong? He’s saying this is what the committee was told by the NSA people. What would be his motive to lie about this? If he’s pro-Obama he’s admitting this against his own interest, which automatically raises the question of why he would lie in order to hurt his own interests.