See my post at #45 above.
The problem is, this first third of liberals enables and serves the second set, who then enable and serve the third set.
I think what you are seeing is not that people cheer her losing her livelihood based on a word she used years ago, but that people cheer seeing her consumed by the negative forces she visually (on television) vocally and financially supported and enabled.
I think it is the irony or justness that has people cheering, if cheering is what it can be called. More like grim satisfaction.
OK, but gloating is a sin.
Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, and let not your heart be glad when he stumbles, lest the Lord see it and be displeased, and turn away his anger from him.
--Proverbs 24:17-18 ESV
My question is, has Martha Stewart "reached out" yet?