Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise

All this happened in federal court with Proposition 8.

The California Supreme Court upheld the process and acceptance of Proposition 8 shortly after that vote took place.

After that happened, the homosexual activists, who were pissed off, decided to sue in federal court instead. It was a federal judge who overturned Proposition 8 as a violation of federal law, not state law.


17 posted on 06/27/2013 8:08:33 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

Right, but it’s still a crock.

The California voters who supported it were disenfranchised. And the US Constitution (even in the amendments) does not mention sexual preference among the protected classes.

Age at which one may marry varies by state.

Any man may marry any women WHO is not already married, is not a close relation, is of age.

No one may marry “anyone they damn well please”. No state permits that, even those that have approved same sex marriage. There are still the above constraints which apparently are constitutional.


18 posted on 06/27/2013 8:14:05 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson