All we care about is if she is honest, or a liar.
We have the answer to that question and you don't like it, which is why you are throwing the race card when it is totally irrelevant.
I guess the fact that she is untruthful is immaterial, eh?
This desperation of the libs just shows they realize how bad this witness crashed and burned yesterday. The only reason people won’t like this witness is because she was exposed as a liar and perjurer. Period.
Oh, f you Christina. Y’all have gone to that well ten million times too often.
"White privilege" paid for that courtroom and those laws with their tax dollars.
What she is, is ignorant and she would be if she was white green or purple........
Yeah right - it's her 'color'... and she's 'hard' - whatever the hell that means. Seems Christina Coleman thinks white people are unable to judge character or truthfulness... we're all stupid. Not that I'm accusing Christina of profiling all whites.../s
How pathetic! Get up off your knees...White self hatred is how our nation finds itself in it's current situation.
This is a mess. Not until Rev Wright did I start to understand how truly great the divide is between us. The bitter anger on both sides is so destructive it’s amazing we’ve come as far as we have.
Did Rachel receive a high school diploma? I’d really like to know.
Again, someone tell me she’s not breeding
And your assumptions about why we view Rachel as we do make YOU feel like you are better, somehow, too, Christina...
But, after all, isn't that the whole point of being a "liberal"? So you can assert your self defined superiority?
Nope, no racism there, not a bit........
Good grief, people like this are clueless.
Because they also speak Ebonics...
Where to even start?
She - CAN"T - READ - HER - OWN - HAND-WRITING.
Why? Because she can't read "cursive"; yet somehow she can write it?!? She can be under oath, yet somehow she can manufacture the "truth" to suit a whim?
This bimbo (and yes, that is an accurate description) can not read, has a very limited intellectual grasp of reality, is blatantly "stupid" by almost any definition - "Cracker" isn't a racial slur? (really?).
And, if I call the bimbo an idiot - why, I must be "racist". Stupidity is color-blind. Or, it used to be, until EEO got into the equation and demanded we lower the bar on what "stupidity" is - so a certain race doesn't get their feelings hurt. Stupidity is a pretty self-evident trait; and this woman embodies it, black, white, yellow, red or purple.
This could score points for Zimmerman.
5.56mm
“If ever I thought myself objective and unbiased, the George Zimmerman trial is definitely not that moment.”
Yes but but your so obviously a progressive, how can YOU say this?
“So let’s cut to the chase. Any attorney, jury member, judge or white person in that courtroom is not going to understand Rachel Jeantel. And I don’t expect them to.”
Speaking coherently makes it easier for everyone to understand what you are saying.
“In fact, I certainly, like my fellow writer Rachel Samara, understand why white people wouldn’t like Rachel.”
Why would you stereotype me because I’m White?
“She’s hard. She’s black. And your assumptions about her background and lack of education make you feel like you are better, somehow.”
So being educated doesn’t make anyone better than anyone else? This “hard Black” woman contributes equally to society?
“That her testimony, no matter how powerful and impactful it may be to this trial, is implausible. Weak, maybe? Let’s impeach her.”
It is “weak and implausible” because she is lying. You see dear lying, even to the White man’s court is a crime. It is not just wrong, but it is a crime. Can even you understand that?
“But maybe the reason white people don’t understand Rachel Jeantel has something more to do with white privilege then, what they would call, Rachel’s capricious nature.”
Using a phrase like “capricious nature” won’t hide your racist assertions about White people. White people pull the wagon in this country and welcome all to sit in it.
“Let’s for one second try to understand why Rachel is “angry” (read emotional), “hood” (read blunt), and “unintelligent” (read multilingual).”
Your “one second” is up, and it proved nothing. Why can’t you and Rachel try to understand why we don’t like liars who are trying to unjustly convict a man or murder when the facts say he is innocent?
“The thing is, what white people see in Rachel has little to do about her own issues, and more to say about the America that white people are blind to. Let’s take her testimony on not calling the police, for example.”
Yes dear calling the police is “snitching” in the fringe world you dare to imply is interchangeable with the greater society.