Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Supreme Court's Ginsburg vows to resist pressure to retire
Yahoo ^ | July 4, 2013 | By Joan Biskupic | Reuters – 5 hours ago

Posted on 07/04/2013 10:56:55 AM PDT by Perdogg

At age 80, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, leader of the Supreme Court's liberal wing, says she is in excellent health, even lifting weights despite having cracked a pair of ribs again, and plans to stay several more years on the bench.

In a Reuters interview late on Tuesday, she vowed to resist any pressure to retire that might come from liberals who want to ensure that Democratic President Barack Obama can pick her successor before the November 2016 presidential election.

(Excerpt) Read more at ca.news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; activistjudges; benghazi; borking; election2014; election2016; fastandfurious; ginsburg; impeachnow; irs; judicialactivism; justiceginsburg; liberalagenda; ruthbaderginsburg; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

1 posted on 07/04/2013 10:56:55 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

You go girl! Stay put.


2 posted on 07/04/2013 10:58:19 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; BuckeyeTexan; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; ...




freepmail BuckeyeTexan or Perdogg to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
3 posted on 07/04/2013 10:58:49 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cruz-Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

I would rather have her on the bench at 80 then one of Odumbo’s liberal POSs on the bench in their 40s.


4 posted on 07/04/2013 10:59:21 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

If she retires in 2016, then Obama would not pick her successor.


5 posted on 07/04/2013 11:00:28 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cruz-Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

If she retired in 2016, say that summer, then Obama would still be president. He’s president until Jan. 20, 2017. Whether the Senate approves a very liberal justice is another matter. It could be a huge confirmation battle, but he would still be the man to pick Supreme Court justices at that time.


6 posted on 07/04/2013 11:02:31 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Why, what’s the difference between liberal POSs of whatever age?


7 posted on 07/04/2013 11:03:01 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
If she retires in 2016, then Obama would not pick her successor.

Right. Hildebeast would.

8 posted on 07/04/2013 11:03:34 AM PDT by luvbach1 (We are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Good - wait for a REAL American POTUS, THEN retire...


9 posted on 07/04/2013 11:05:13 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I wouldn't put it past Valerie Jarrett to commission a little "Pelican Brief" action to clear the way for the two judges she has "ready to go."
10 posted on 07/04/2013 11:05:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who could have known that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional news?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
If she retired in 2016, say that summer, then Obama would still be president. He’s president until Jan. 20, 2017. Whether the Senate approves a very liberal justice is another matter. It could be a huge confirmation battle, but he would still be the man to pick Supreme Court justices at that time.

What if, the day before inauguration, he nominated himself for the Supreme Court?

11 posted on 07/04/2013 11:06:02 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It is a tradition that all federal judicial vacancies in an presidential election are held off until after the election.

This tradition was backed-up by a GOP blue note last year.


12 posted on 07/04/2013 11:06:31 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cruz-Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Stay put YOU LOOK TERRIFIC!!!! YOU HAVE THE INFECTIOUS SMILE OF A SCHOOLGIRL !!!!


13 posted on 07/04/2013 11:06:34 AM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing - Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Agreed. I would rather have an 80 something Ruth on the bench, than a young liberal appointee.

As far as judges go, the 2016 election is critical. If a Democrat wins that election, then Ginsburg, Breyer, Scalia, Kennedy, at the least, will retire within the term of that president. Their replacements will all be very liberal.

Why is it that we can’t always depend on Republican presidents to appoint solid conservatives though? If you look at John Paul Stevens in his later years, or Anthony Kennedy today, it’s hard to believe that Republicans appointed them.

On the other hand, if a RINO is elected president in 2016, then he will probably appoint more moderate types of judges, who will be liberal on many cases that come before the court.


14 posted on 07/04/2013 11:06:55 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Would Barack Obama have that much hubris, to nominate himself for the Supreme Court?????


15 posted on 07/04/2013 11:08:06 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; BuckeyeTexan

Can you confirm what I just wrote, I believe I have it right?


16 posted on 07/04/2013 11:08:12 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cruz-Paul 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Because the end of her lifetime appointment is statistically nearer than someone who is in their 40s.


17 posted on 07/04/2013 11:09:34 AM PDT by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Hopefully that tradition holds through the 2016 election year. I pray for the continued good health and service of all of the members of this court. I really hope that Obama does NOT get to make any more nominations to the Supreme Court.


18 posted on 07/04/2013 11:09:52 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Echoing what others have said...she knows what the alternative would be.

She looks younger than Hilary AND SanFranNan.

19 posted on 07/04/2013 11:10:35 AM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Let them remove her when the smell of putrefaction becomes intolerable.


20 posted on 07/04/2013 11:10:39 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson