Sure they destroy them, they promise. 
Posted on 07/17/2013 11:55:20 AM PDT by iowamark
You know about speed cameras and red-light cameras. But did you know about plate-reading cameras? Few people do, and that's a worry for the ACLU, which says the cameras are infringing on our civil liberties. Unlike the speed and red-light cameras, which are activated only when someone violates a traffic law, plate cameras photograph every license plate that goes by. Vehicles are instantly IDed then checked against cars associated with crimes, the Washington Post reports. The problem, says the ACLU, is that the license plate info is being stored, creating huge databases of motorists and where they travel—even though more than 99% of those recorded are innocent. ACLU privacy lawyer Catherine Crump calls the cameras "the most pervasive system of location tracking that people haven't heard of," per NBC News.
Despite the massive amounts of data, authorities rarely record a "hit," according to an ACLU review of 600 local and state police departments. Maryland, for instance, collected data on 85 million plates last year, but only one in 500 matched with a criminal offense, and 97% of those were for minor violations (say, an emissions test violation). Just 47 per million were potentially serious crimes. But "those are 47 cases that may not otherwise have every been resolved," says an International Association of Chiefs of Police spokesperson. "If you can make 47 apprehensions, keep those 47 dangerous people off the street, that has real value." The ACLU doesn't see it that way. "We just think innocent people shouldn't end up in a database," says Crump. The Post notes that some departments wipe the records after a few weeks or months; some never purge them.
All the stars out there appear to be aligning for Libertarians, don’t they?
Seems like it.
If the cameras only saved the info on plates where there was a “hit” then it would still serve the legitimate police needs without infringing on the innocent.
The license plate info is being stored, creating huge databases of motorists and where they travel — even though more than 99% of those recorded are innocent.
They drive thru parking lots like at Cabalas and Bass Pro Shop or Churches looking for the bitter clingers ?
By the same logic, if they did house-to-house no-knock searches in pretty much any inner city high crime area, they'd get criminals off the street as well. Likely a lot more than 47 per million, too.
Sometimes, 47 criminals must go free to save the one million innocent people from living in a police state.
From what I’ve heard, here in Maine, there is a state law requiring police to destroy these records after 30 days.
I have the sneaking suspicion that if one of us were to go around photographing and recording and databasing plate numbers on police cars, they’d suddenly find a reason to be upset with it.
If the cameras only saved the info on plates where there was a “hit” then it would still serve the legitimate police needs without infringing on the innocent.
How much fun would that be?
“I have the sneaking suspicion that if one of us were to go around photographing and recording and databasing plate numbers on police cars, they’d suddenly find a reason to be upset with it.”
If you or I were to go around photographing, recording and databasing the plate numbers of ANY cars, much less police cars, you and I would be hauled off in handcuffs.
Land of the free? It’s a nice concept.
bookmark
They aren’t innocent. We just haven’t found out what kind of crimes they have committed -— yet. (/s)
Sure they destroy them, they promise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.