Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The IRS: Exempt from Obamacare While Making the Rest of Us Comply
Townhall.com ^ | July 29, 2013 | Daniel J. Mitchell

Posted on 07/29/2013 7:26:45 AM PDT by Kaslin

There are lots of despicable people in Washington engaged in a lot of unsavory behavior, so it would be very difficult to get agreement if you asked regular people to select the most odious feature of the political class.

HypocrisyMany people would probably choose corruption as the defining characteristic of Washington, and it would be hard to argue with that choice, but I think hypocrisy is an even better choice.

There's something fundamentally wrong when people push for policies while making sure they don't have to abide by the results. Yet it happens all the time in government.

1. It galls me that the pro-tax bureaucrats at the OECD get tax-free salaries while pushing for higher taxes on everyone else.

2. Or how about rich left wingers who bleat about compassion but who are stingy with their own money.

3. And the wealthy leftists who use tax havens while trying to deny others from protecting their money.

4. There are members of the Washington elite who don't have to live under the gun control laws they impose on others.

5. What about the politically connected business types who endorse higher taxes in exchange for favors from Washington.

6. Or the politicians who evade the taxes they impose on ordinary citizens.

7. How about Canadian politicians who support government-run healthcare but then come to America when they need treatment.

8. To close this list on a humorous note, we also have Occupy Wall Street protesters who fight ÒThe ManÓ while wanting to make ÒThe ManÓ more powerful.

But if you want a really powerful example of hypocrisy, nothing stands out more than politicians trying to exempt themselves from Obamacare.

Crocodile TearsThey've even been complaining that the law is so bad that they may quit their jobs. And they're so disconnected from reality that they think we'll be upset at the loss of their ÒseniorityÓ and ÒexperienceÓ Ð as if taxpayers value their ability to squander money.

But it's not just politicians who are being hypocritical. The bureaucrats at the IRS also don't want to live under Obamacare even though they're the ones who will be forcing us to live under that misguided law!

Here are some excerpts from a report in the Washington Examiner.

IRS employees have a prominent role in Obamacare, but their union wants no part of the law. National Treasury Employees Union officials are urging members to write their congressional representatives in opposition to receiving coverage through President Obama's health care law. ÉLike most other federal workers, IRS employees currently get their health insurance through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, which also covers members of Congress. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp offered the bill in response to reports of congressional negotiations that would exempt lawmakers and their staff from Obamacare. ÉCamp spokeswoman Allie Walker said. ÒIf the Obamacare exchanges are good enough for the hardworking Americans and small businesses the law claims to help, then they should be good enough for the president, vice president, Congress and federal employees,Ó she also said.

To augment the remarks of Rep. Camp's spokeswoman, it also would be good to somehow figure out a way to make the lobbyists and other Washington insiders participate in the Obamacare exchanges.

There aren't many Òsure thingsÓ in life, but one of them is that Obamacare would be repealed almost instantaneously if the bigwigs in Washington actually had to live under the law designed for peasants like you and me.

Unfortunately, that's why Congressman Camp's legislation will never get approved.

So let's end this post with a bit of dark humor from Bob Gorrell.

Obamacare Cartoon July 2013 6

You can enjoy more Obamacare cartoons by clicking here, herehereherehere, and here.

P.S. For readers in New Jersey (and also New York City), I'll be speaking this upcoming Wednesday, July 31, at the Friedman Day luncheon sponsored by Americans for Prosperity.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: aca; corruption; democrats; fraud; govtabuse; irs; irsbrownshirts; liberalhypocrisy; nteu; obama; obamacare; scandals; tyranny; wewillnotcomply

1 posted on 07/29/2013 7:26:45 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

we are flirting with the establishment of an elite government class that is exempt from the rules that they enforce upon the rest of us.


2 posted on 07/29/2013 7:29:25 AM PDT by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Congress - EXEMPT

Congressional staff - EXEMPT

Anyone who pays off Congress (quid pro quo) - EXEMPT

Islam - EXEMPT


3 posted on 07/29/2013 7:29:34 AM PDT by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s beyond hypocrisy. Tyrants don’t bother with excuses for their depredation.


4 posted on 07/29/2013 7:29:35 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
There is only one fair solution: Everybody should be exempt.
0bama likes fairness and level playing fields, or so he says.
So there it is.

5 posted on 07/29/2013 7:37:40 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Since 5 members of SCOTUS found it only passes constitutional muster as a tax (even though it is NOT), the unjust, dishonest and unequal application of this bs 'tax' is certainly UNCONSTITUTIONAL under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
6 posted on 07/29/2013 7:38:20 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why I am I not afforded “Equal Protection” from ObamaCare?


7 posted on 07/29/2013 7:39:21 AM PDT by TexasCajun (Creepy-Ass Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

8 posted on 07/29/2013 7:41:52 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Palin was right (again)!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

Maybe they should think about that. They may be flirting with a public that is getting sick and tired of their sh!t.

It’s way past time for us to start taking back our country. By whatever means.


9 posted on 07/29/2013 7:52:09 AM PDT by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It would have been very hard to staff the ovens of Auswitz if the Nazi guards had not been exempt from that institution. What makes the IRA and Obamacare any different?

Snazzy uniforms?


10 posted on 07/29/2013 8:03:05 AM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
 photo bullhorningman-2_zps3f62fcb9.jpg

11 posted on 07/29/2013 8:39:57 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (Hitler would have LOVED obozo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I thought if you “liked your plan you could keep it.”


12 posted on 07/29/2013 9:00:26 AM PDT by mom.mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Because that arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave does not consider us equal to him


13 posted on 07/29/2013 9:19:41 AM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This is a 5th and 14th Amendment and Article 1 section 10 VIOLATION. “No Title of Nobility shall be granted”

Slaughter-House cases. 83 U.S. 36., (1872)

GIBBONS v. OGDEN, 22 U.S. 1 (1824)

Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co,. 486 U.S. 750 (1988)

Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising 449 U.S. (1991)

Leathers v. Medlock,. 499 U.S. 439 (1991)


14 posted on 07/29/2013 9:25:43 AM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Post #14 gives 5 cases to back your claims.

Let’s see how many people come on here and claim it to be bullchit.


15 posted on 07/29/2013 9:28:18 AM PDT by phockthis (http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

That’s just ONE of the things we’re flirting with when the left/elite try to set up different laws for themselves than for us.


16 posted on 07/29/2013 9:29:24 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: phockthis

That last case... was that Sydney Leathers?


17 posted on 07/29/2013 9:30:19 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They just keep pushing...


18 posted on 07/29/2013 9:55:49 AM PDT by SENTINEL (Kneel down to God. Stand up to tyrants. STICK TO YOUR GUNS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson