To: rellimpank
but will the youth gangs and other criminal element be deterred by more gun restrictions?
To: rellimpank
---gee whillikers---Barrett and C of P admit there may be a connection between criminals and crime--
--this is a bit different than the usual J-S stuff--
3 posted on
08/06/2013 5:53:42 AM PDT by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: rellimpank
Flynn and Barrett said the linkage between firearms-related deadly violence and criminals was clear-cut...
Well I'll be, who would have thought.
To: rellimpank
...and the criminals (being the good citizens there are) will follow those laws??? Idiocy!
7 posted on
08/06/2013 6:02:15 AM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: rellimpank
9 posted on
08/06/2013 6:02:29 AM PDT by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: rellimpank
Hmmm - I think I see the problem. And gun control won't solve it.
He added that the majority of shooters and their victims were people with long criminal histories.
10 posted on
08/06/2013 6:03:30 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: rellimpank
Make every violent criminal act committed with a gun a crime punishable by life without parole and leave the honest law abiding gun owners alone. Any violent crime committed with a gun is attempted murder.
Governments at all levels have let every crisis be an opportunity to remove, or restrict our Creator Given Rights, supposedly guaranteed by the Constitution. Nice, criminals commit a crime and the honest public pay twice. Once for the original crime and secondly for the loss of freedom.
Time is long passed where we need to treat all levels of government as criminal enterprises subject to RICO prosecution.
11 posted on
08/06/2013 6:03:33 AM PDT by
Wurlitzer
(Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam! 969)
To: rellimpank
Both called on legislators to enact a law that calls for a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for illegally possessing a firearmsZero tolerance laws are needed because of crappy judges.
13 posted on
08/06/2013 6:13:52 AM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Play the 'Knockout Game' with someone owning a 9mm and you get what you deserve)
To: rellimpank
Gee Whiz. Why don’t they just raise taxes. That should solve the problem.
15 posted on
08/06/2013 6:19:14 AM PDT by
headstamp 2
(What would Scooby do?)
To: rellimpank
So if I’m willing to murder someone, why would I give a whit about a 3 year sentence for firearm possession?
To: rellimpank
That’ll do the trick.With about the toughest gun laws in the nation Chicago's murder rate has plummeted 2% to only 75 per weekend.
To: rellimpank
Longer sentences and tougher judges for armed criminals makes sense. So does imposing the death penalty for murder, as long as it is carried out expeditiously.
22 posted on
08/06/2013 7:56:44 AM PDT by
yefragetuwrabrumuy
(Be Brave! Fear is just the opposite of Nar!)
To: rellimpank
Leave it to the liberal press. This isn’t a gun control law, it is a punish the criminals for the crime of carrying a firearm and using it illegally. The NRA has pushed these type of laws for decades. Pass laws that have mandatory sentencing for committing crimes with firearms and for felons who carry firearms. Real common sense laws, unlike the liberals BS of banning guns for everyone.
23 posted on
08/06/2013 8:49:38 AM PDT by
calex59
To: rellimpank
Because tougher gun laws worked so well for Chicago, D.C., Detroit, L.A. .......
24 posted on
08/06/2013 12:09:25 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Where's my pressure cooker backpack wmd ricin laced al qaeda terrorist BASSELOPE?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson