Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibLieSlayer

Glenn Beck interviewed Nancy Mace this morning and she appeared as qualified as Carolyn Kennedy.

She appears to have no idea why she is running to attain one of the most powerful positions in the world. She had no answer to several questions and used talking points to fill space. She has no money, but hopes to win in a run-off - which will require even more money than a regular election. It was more than a disappointment.

Totally unprepared to be a sitting Senator. Maybe not even ready for a House seat.

Her accomplishments are writing a book that was ghost-written for her, getting into Citadel (a year late) by having a father who was a Commandant of the school, and.... that’s about it. Honestly.

I can only hope that Bright has something to offer.

This election won’t be some kind of cake walk.

South Carolina is FULL of people who would be fantastic. I hope they stand up. Quickly.

(Apologies ahead of time to Mace fans)


13 posted on 08/06/2013 12:49:12 PM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Noamie

You sure you’re not Lindsey?


17 posted on 08/06/2013 12:59:29 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Noamie
glennbeck.com: Could this be the candidate to take down Lindsay Graham?
22 posted on 08/06/2013 1:14:54 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Noamie

Mace will be whoever she is and do whatever she will... and we will all have to wait and see. She either has it or she will go away quickly. As far as her past is concerned... be very careful. Any negatives need to be verified and if they cannot be verified... lightfoot is likely the source. fagraham is notorious for sliming with untruths. Now if she is a slacker... it will come out and she should be shunned for a better candidate... and this new man running may be him.

LLS


26 posted on 08/06/2013 1:39:05 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Noamie
Her accomplishments are writing a book that was ghost-written for her, getting into Citadel (a year late) by having a father who was a Commandant of the school, and.... that’s about it. Honestly.

So she adheres to the Obama model of political office seeking.

35 posted on 08/06/2013 2:03:08 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Noamie
Glenn Beck interviewed Nancy Mace this morning...

Listened to it and Beck was a jerk! His question: "What's in your soul?" and, his incessant brow beating, caused me to change stations.

59 posted on 08/06/2013 4:44:30 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Noamie
“Glenn Beck interviewed Nancy Mace this morning and she appeared as qualified as Carolyn Kennedy.”

Bullshit

I listened to the entire interview and heard a rock solid constitutional conservative fluently and confidently handle rambling, long winded questions from Beck, and idiot questions from Beck's tedious side kick.

She was very careful in how she answered the questions showing message discipline and precise use of the English language.

She also knew exactly which conservative Senators are actually fighting Obamacare and Amnesty and correctly pointed out that the rule of law and the Constitution are the fundamental principles of US conservative politics.

She was flawless on the foreign policy issue raised, deflecting Beck's trap perfectly. Many US politicians cannot do that without being tipped off in advance what the questions are.

What we have with Nancy Mace is a Steel Butterfly, one that will be immune to the peer pressure of Creepy Washington “society.”

As a Woman, she is also inherently more resistant to attacks from the PRISM Data warehouse mining operation being run by communists/GOPe Quislings infiltrated into NSA and the political class.

South Carolina is a 50%+ winner or run off race. Dewhurst had a lot more money and lying consultant vermin in Texas than graham does, and he still lost in a run off simply because more casual voters cannot be bothered to vote a second time.

OK the race is also a open primary, but with a wide field it is quite possible Graham will still fail to get over 50%.

Lot what a endorsement from Sarah Palin did for Ted Cruz, and imagine what one could do for Nancy Mace.

63 posted on 08/06/2013 5:06:16 PM PDT by Exmil_UK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson