Splitting the vote...just saying
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
She could not elaborate upon any of these things. She may end up being fantastic... but she was not on the ball and was not able to rise to the level that it will take to beat grahamnesty. She may be fine... just telling it like it is today. She was good on many of her answers but Beck asks everyone that question on their soul and she or someone near her didn't do the proper research... fag-boy graham will.
/johnny
And it's been said for time immemorial whenever a liberal registered as a Republican faces a challenge from a principled conservative. Other than the fact that the simplistic statement is full of fallacies and naive assumptions, it has been said so many times it doesn't need to be said any more.
The more people in the primary reduce Pansy's odds of getting 51%of the primary vote. This is a good thing.
SC has a runoff is no one gets 50%+1, so having several conservatives challenging Graham won’t “split the vote,” it will increase the odds of holding Graham under 50% in the first round and forcing him into a one-on-one runoff against whomever finishes second.