... and only if both weapons are equally matched and after both parties have walked 30 paces from each other and each has a ‘second’ as a witness ...
Other rules here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duel
Well cops have been killing people who they thought had a gun even though they didn’t have one. Then too, they’ve killed obviously unarmed citizens. So if cops can, then .....
Oh sure, I’d have a really good chance in a fistfight, as I’m a 5’2” woman, and not as young as I once was.
Remember to always store a large fighting knife with your gun, and to carry them both in household defense. It’s a technique that goes back to trench warfare in World War I; and what’s the inside of a building, other than a trench with a ceiling?
they are freaking idiots and no one should take their advice.
they know nothing about the use of force, and the concept of disparity of force, which legally justifies a person using a gun against lesser armed attackers. baseball’bats, pipes, bras knuckles, a sucker punch, hammer, screwdriver, etc can kill. multiple attackers against one. bigger attacker. younger attacker against’an older person. if you are injured or disabled. if your eyesight sucks/legally’blind. if you are ambushed by one or more attackers who already know what they are trying to do to you.
there are many reasons to use a gun in the above scenarios.
Baloney - the mayors are full if it.
You have to right to use deadly force any time you feel as if death or serious bodily harm is imminent. The thug doesn’t need to have a gun, or even a weapon.
“Mark Glaze, executive director of MAIG, believes that someone should only be allowed to use a gun to defend themselves if their attacker also has a one.”
Hey Marky, is this policy practiced by every police department in MAIG-maid cities? Any?
We all know the answer.
if there are two attackers, one of them could hold your and the assailant’s coats.
Swords aren’t dangerous? Learn something every day.