How about this advice: Shoot first and ask questions later.
What if they attack you with a pointed stick?
BTW, it's good to see you back on FR.
/johnny
So this creep wants a 90 year old 100 lbs granny who has a gun should not shoot a 20 something 230 lbs male who is beating her and trying to rape her.
Just when you think the left has gone full retard and can’t be any dumber they turn it up to “11”.
If you attack me and you don’t have a gun you’ve just made a terrible (and most likely fatal) mistake because I do and I will use it.
Never pick a fight with an old man, he will just kill you.
How about Obama's son's quit assaulting people? Idiots!
Alices in Dunderland.
Virtually all people who honestly bear guns take a sense of very serious responsibility with them (sometimes I do wonder with police stories, but at least our private militia is that way). They don’t fire shots at people on larks! (And neither did Zimmerman... the idea that he led on an attack so that he could eventually shoot the Skittles kid is so fantastic that it seems the advocates of the idea are taking hallucinogens.)
MAIG is German for “retarted, sir” - right?
How is your knife-throwing accuracy? The victim doesn't know the assailant or his training,
The paucity of the anti-gun arguments should alienate not just gun owners, but anyone who appreciates a well-reasoned debate. These people are like children who take a stand then find the flimsiest “logic” to support it. It’s hard to believe some of them are adults, let alone people in leadership positions.
So women or the men who stand about 5’5 130 lbs or less should take the beating from the man who is a foot taller and 50-100 lbs heavier. Yeah, just get in a fist fight with your much larger and stronger attacker. You’ve got an equal chance. (snicker)
Next they will be asking why people are carrying more than one gun. /s
I’d rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
Tell THAT to a woman being raped at knifepoint, you jack*ss.
The bigger and stronger don’t need guns, unless you have one. In fact, they would likely prefer a gun free society.
Because they can then beat you to death at the time and place of their choosing.
Once again, liberalism is a MENTAL DISEASE.
Everyday we see and read examples of their mental incompetence.
These mental zombies have no business in any position of leadership whatsoever, not even dog catcher. They belong in an ayslum far away from the rest of society. They are insane...to the core...and going to get the rest of us all killed if they have their way.
There is only one equalizing force that will work for a woman. A gun provides me distance from a man. He can live if he stays away from me, but if he comes after me, I have to shoot him if I want to live. I can't afford to wait and see if he just breaks my ribs rather than crushing my head.
This whole idea is nuts. It would go something like this:
“I'm going to attack you but let's set the guidelines for this encounter. I'll break your arm, but since you are right handed, I'll break your left arm so you can still write and throw a ball.”
“Okay, you break my left arm and I'll give you a concussion, but not one that will kill you.”
The fight begins with those rules, but one has just lied and taken a handgun out of his waist and kills the other one, saying before the guy dies, “I lied, you sorry bastard.”
For me, I have no choice but to shoot if it is a man attacker, that's just the way it is.
What if the perp is 6’6” tall and 300lbs. And the ‘victim’ is 5’0” and 110lbs?
As I recall, Ted Bundy never used a gun. Just a tire iron or other blunt object and simply being bigger than the victims.
![did this [DO NOT CLICK if you are squeamish - very disturbing image]](http://www.chemicalbiological.net/graphic%20knife%20wound.jpg){kind=link}