Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plummz

Sorry, but he was never naturalized. Especially not under 1401.

What people are stupidly arguing is that “natural born citizen” should have been stated as “citizen at birth” when the two under English mean the same thing.


97 posted on 08/30/2013 2:53:06 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad
he was never naturalized

So you're saying he shold be deported?

109 posted on 08/30/2013 3:30:59 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad
What people are stupidly arguing is that “natural born citizen” should have been stated as “citizen at birth” when the two under English mean the same thing.

The USCIS has already proven that false. "Natural born citizen" and "citizen at birth" are NOT the same.

Details here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3059469/posts?q=1&;page=179#174

190 posted on 08/30/2013 5:43:36 PM PDT by Rides3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson