I don’t take issue with any of that. But I don’t see that any of it means there is a right to property anymore than there is a right to happiness.
I really don’t know what you’re getting at.
The usual formulation of the founders was “life, liberty, property.” It seems that the unique formulation of the Declaration, “life, liberty, happiness,” means essentially the same thing.
Once liberals try to get citizens to question what is a right or not, its a ure bet they are about to try to strip them from you. Just another Alinskyish style tactic from the socialist left.