At a presentation he once said he wanted his son to be an IDF sniper:
Hey, why not send him off to fight Assad, right?
Sounds abundantly logical.
Adelson will instead fight to the last corn-fed Iowa boy?
Hmmmm....I see.
Help me out here. What coalition is he talking about?
Support anything that might degrade an enemy of Israel. I can understand the thinking but I disagree in this instance because the possibility of the strike being counterproductive is somewhere north of 90%.
Hey Sheldon, don't look now, but your wussy-boy Hussein 0bama is standing BEHIND you.
Keep this in mind: the ragheads have chemical weapons and if they don't use them on each other, who will they use them on? - us!
I never have and never will go to Vegas
This is exactly why it’s very disconcerting when these Big Republican Donors, who are particularly socially liberal and usually want big government in some cronyism-way, align themselves to the Presidential candidates. These people influence the candidates through the advisors they hire
I’ve never been too impressed with Adelson. He didn’t want Santorum’s “extremist” views on abortion in the white house and sell’s gay ‘marriage” in his wedding chapels.
Well Sheldon yet again finds himself on the opposite side of the DUers. Strange world we live in...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023602944
I’m not convinced this works for Jews
Israel, you got two choices. Either Assad or Al-Qaeda for your neighbor. You decide.
How can one say they stand with someone who is unwilling to make a stand? At a time when it is imperative that a President make a stand and present his case before Congress, this Pres—ent leaves the country.
Sheldon really does detest the Clown, so it means something when he says this...but he is still wrong.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-05/standoff-mediterranean-us-vs-russian-navies
Games on thanks to Liberals?