Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteelTrap
The difference between 'junk science' and real science is clearly illustrated in the article (either you didn't read it or you did and do not get it).

When the authors offer many cautions about their own study and point out the shortcomings, it is good science and up to community standards.

And, as they importantly point out with an illustrative story about ice cream, association does NOT mean causality; however, it can point one in the direction of truth (although not always).

At any rate, there is a large body of data which points to BPA as a bad actor and you might read a bit more about it. For example, here, here and here.

9 posted on 09/09/2013 6:34:47 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Pharmboy

Thanks Pharm I should have indicated you are preaching to the choir on BPA. I get it. I just objected (lightly) to the min-hype of another org claiming objectivity in a sea of subjectivity. Science no longer matters of course. If it did, we would not be having this conversation right?


10 posted on 09/09/2013 6:48:00 PM PDT by SteelTrap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson