To: xzins
Reports of anti-tank arms surfaced several weeks ago, presumably through Saudi Arabia. But as noted, if the US is helping this would be contrary to Obama’s “public” orders.
12 posted on
09/12/2013 5:28:22 AM PDT by
11th Commandment
(http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
To: 11th Commandment
But as noted, if the US is helping this would be contrary to Obama’s “public” orders.
Apparently, then, someone in Syria has come up with rock solid proof of US complicity.
16 posted on
09/12/2013 5:31:51 AM PDT by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: 11th Commandment
Reports of anti-tank arms surfaced several weeks ago, presumably through Saudi Arabia.
That's how it works. We give arms to a second party middle man who in turn gives different weapons to the intended third party.
18 posted on
09/12/2013 5:33:35 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: 11th Commandment
Reports of anti-tank arms surfaced several weeks ago, presumably through Saudi Arabia. But as noted, if the US is helping this would be contrary to Obama’s “public” orders.Saudi Arabia purchases a high percentage of their arms from the US (US manufactured arms) so the supply of arms is not truly non US manufactured arms. LIES, LIES, LIES
63 posted on
09/12/2013 9:12:09 AM PDT by
thegrump
To: 11th Commandment
> Reports of anti-tank arms surfaced several weeks ago, presumably through Saudi Arabia. But as noted, if the US is helping this would be contrary to Obama’s “public” orders.
And without Obama’s ...ahem...knowledge or approval per the ...ahem...plauible deniability clause...cough...cough
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson