Posted on 09/12/2013 9:19:10 AM PDT by xzins
12 years have passed since 9/11, and Western leaders still refuse to get real about the threat of radical Islam.
A few years ago, CBN News filmed Denmark's Muslim community marching through the streets of Copenhagen under a banner that read "Islam is peace and love."
It would be great if it were true. But a few weeks ago one of Denmark's most influential Muslim leaders dropped a bombshell when he admitted that every mosque in Denmark is controlled by a radical imam.
Even before George W. Bush went to a Washington, D.C. mosque after 9/11 and said the World Trade Center attack was not the true face of Islam, critics have accused Western leaders of being more concerned with appearing tolerant than confronting the threat posed by radical Islam. This is because while the vast majority of the world's Muslims are not terrorists, the vast majority of the world's terrorists are Muslims.
The United States has foiled more than 60 terrorist plots since 9/11. Britain uncovers at least one major terrorist attack every year. But there are other forms of violence from Muslim culture that authorities aren't facing.
Police Cover-Up?
Britain is still reeling from a scandal in which police covered up a Muslim rape gang epidemic for 10 years; one in which primarily Pakistani men made white English girls their sex slaves.
For years, British authorities tried to pretend that Muslim sex grooming gangs didn't exist. And so the problem grew, and more young women had their lives ruined.
Muslim immigrant gangs in Britain are still so dangerous that when CBN News tried to interview rape gang victims no one would go on camera. Even their family members and friends insisted that they would be in danger if their identities or faces were shown.
A woman from northern England, who we're calling "Christine," told us there are areas now where young girls just can't walk down their own streets. People are too scared to come out and say what is going on."
"The real scandal is that this has been going on for 20 years, and no policeman has ever resigned over this," said George Igler, director of the Discourse Institute in Britain told CBN News.
"For 20 years, they just did not investigate. And the reason why they didn't investigate was just the inability to speak freely," he said. "The fact that something was taboo, meant you couldn't talk about it."
Tyranny of Tolerance
According to Igler, when British solder Lee Rigby was beheaded in the streets of London by a Nigerian Muslim, one of British Prime Minister David Cameron's first orders of business was to appear open minded and tolerant.
"He didn't look into the camera and say, 'I'm tripling base security immediately. We will find those who are responsible, This has got nothing to do with Islam,'" he said. "So, all these people who were listening realized in an instant that they were being lied to," Rigler said.
Cameron had to be corrected by an Islamic terrorist group that bluntly stated the Rigby murder was indeed because of Islam.
Rape Epidemic
Another issue politicians don't want to discuss is rape.
Some now call Sweden the rape capital of the world. According to one study, during a five-year period almost four out of five rapes were committed by primarily Muslim immigrants.
Norway has had its own rape epidemic against blonde Norwegian women by immigrant men. Some blondes have dyed their hair black or travel only in groups. Or some wear Muslim hijabs, or headscarves, as protection against rape.
"For some [Muslim males] the hijab is a symbolic marker that separates the submissive proper Muslim women from what they see as the 'Norwegian whores,'" Kristin Spitznogle, a therapist who has treated some of the rape victims, said. "When I say 'whores,' I'm really just referring to their own words. This is what they told journalists."
Strange Bedfellows
Meanwhile, Muslims and the European Left continue their strange political partnership.
While they are polar opposites on social issues like women's rights, abortion, and homosexuality, Muslims vote for the Left while the Left grows its constituency by encouraging Muslim immigration and the spread of Islamic values.
"Third World immigrants to Denmark, something like 95 percent, vote for the Left," Danish Islamic expert Lars Hedegaard explained. "If they can open the floodgates for Third World immigrants, they can more than import and secure their own voters."
America, too, has been trying to advance the cause of Muslim radicals in Syria and Egypt.
President Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., have been pushing Congress to allow the United States to help the Syrian rebel movement, which includes al Qaeda terrorists.
The president also supported the ousted Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt against the will of the majority of Egyptians.
It's what has been happening in virtually every Western nation for years: politicians not just pretending radical Islam isn't he enemy, but actually helping it spread.
President Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., have been pushing Congress to allow the United States to help the Syrian rebel movement, which includes al Qaeda terrorists.
Damn right the west is protecting Radical Islam. We are owned by those ragheads.
‘Are we protecting the Nazis?’ Imagine that one 70 years ago.
Excellent.
We have spent blood and treasure to advance the cause of those who hate and murder us
No use pretending. We are rapidly losing civilization, thanks to priviliged members of officially-certified victim groups.
In the USA, there are huge areas of the country where normal people don’t go because their lives are in danger, and the police are told by the corrupt administrations not to give a damn.
No one talks about it. The American way = don’t talk about it, don’t admit it, maybe it’s not really happening.
Anyone who notices that the rapes, thefts, and murders are committed mostly by those two specially-priviliged victim groups is called a racist.
There are several details of this which are needed as background.
1) Most Sunni Imams are trained in radical Wahhabi Madrassas (religious schools) in Pakistan, to a large extent funded by Saudi Arabia. The means that, around the world, in 90% of Islam (non-Shiite), no matter what sect of Sunni Islam it is: radical, moderate, or generally peaceful; their Imam will likely be a radical Wahhabi. For more peaceful mosques, this is a major pain in the rear end, because their clergyman will use their donations to support radicalism, and try to convince their children to be radicals.
2) Since about the 1980’s, the west has faced the dilemma that among Muslims, only a percentage of them are potentially dangerous. Of that group, only a small number would ever take up arms, usually in defense of their country or territory. And of that group, only a small number have the get-up-and-go to leave their country, get training, and travel to another country to carry out acts of terrorism.
Unfortunately, this smallest group may still number in the millions, but they both have the support of a far larger number; and the hardest thing for us to deal with is that they are fully integrated with those who aren’t. This means spread in a low density around the world.
As such, we cannot fight them directly. So our efforts have been to convince them to voluntarily concentrate and fight out military, at a time and place of our choosing, rather than staying diffuse and attacking our civilians when they feel like it.
Both Afghanistan and Iraq served that purpose, bringing in large numbers of their most enthusiastic killers to enter our nation-sized roach motels. Already we have at least decimated (1 in 10) their most dangerous fighters, and possibly more than that, exterminating those among them who know how to fight, preventing them from getting better at combat.
This finally brings us back to the topic: Is the West protecting radical Islam? The truth is “yes and no”. No to the point where we are actively encouraging them to become peaceful instead of violent. But at the same time, yes, but only to concentrate radicals so that we can kill them.
Of course there are a lot of simpletons who truly do want to protect and support radical Islam. But their efforts are foolish, because they are fools.
In Norway, leftists and islamic business cronies are happy to try and kill theiir own families in service of “radical islam”. In fact, some data now point to the “Breivik event” being set up by the left as their polls were tanking.
Now, after the “rightwing” election victory, the leftists and islamists are safely ensconced inside these parties. Dealing with them at the polls is very difficult.
Slowly is changing. Notice the bikers that went down to D.C. yesterday. The so-called million Muslim march was no more than 24 protesters. Even they were counter-protested by a Christian protest group.
That old beat-up so-called “race card” has been let’s just say, “declined”.
Bush going to their indoctrination center was an example of a typical well-meaning liberal really thinking that only an unbelievably tiny minority of the ROP is terrorist, and that the vast majority is peace-loving, kind, etc.
Meanwhile they just laugh at our naive understanding of their bunch.
Demented Western politicians are not only protecting Radical Islam, they’re promoting it - even as the Moslems swear to bring down the politicians’ nations.
It’s always amazed me how this country (and others) are embracing that fanatical religion after 9/11. It’s maddening. It’s like the world embracing Nazi-ism after WWII.
HA! See my previous post. Great minds .....
Liberal western governments are, wittingly or unwittingly, the most lethal threat their own people face.
Why?
Could it be that liberalism is socialism and they think to provoke a worldwide conflict from which a weakened west will be undone by a strong China/Russia, and they think that their weaponry will easily subdue medieval islam? In the meantime, islam will be their tool to further weaken the west.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.