Opposing Obamacare Isn’t Anarchy

National Review ^ | 09/27/2013 | Jonah Goldberg

[Graewoulf]

MAKE DC LISTEN: TELL YOUR SENATORS TO OPPOSE CLOTURE ON H.J. RES 59
We must oppose cloture on H. J. Res. 59, so that Harry Reid and Senate Democrats cannot sneak in funding for Obamacare. We need you to call your Senators right now: tell them to oppose cloture on H.J. Res 59 and remind them that a vote for cloture IS a for funding Obamacare.

State Senator Party Phone
AK Mark Begich D (202) 224-3004
AK Lisa Murkowski R (202) 224-6665
AL Jeff Sessions R (202) 224-4124
AL Richard C. Shelby R (202) 224-5744
AR John Boozman R (202) 224-4843
AR Mark L. Pryor D (202) 224-2353
AZ Jeff Flake R (202) 224-4521
AZ John McCain R (202) 224-2235
CA Barbara Boxer D (202) 224-3553
CA Dianne Feinstein D (202) 224-3841
CO Michael F. Bennet D (202) 224-5852
CO Mark Udall D (202) 224-5941
CT Richard Blumenthal D (202) 224-2823
CT Christopher Murphy D (202) 224-4041
DE Thomas R. Carper D (202) 224-2441
DE Christopher A. Coons D (202) 224-5042
FL Bill Nelson D (202) 224-5274
FL Marco Rubio R (202) 224-3041
GA Saxby Chambliss R (202) 224-3521
GA Johnny Isakson R (202) 224-3643
HI Mazie K. Hirono D (202) 224-6361
HI Brian Schatz D (202) 224-3934
IA Chuck Grassley R (202) 224-3744
IA Tom Harkin D (202) 224-3254
ID Mike Crapo R (202) 224-6142
ID James E. Risch R (202) 224-2752
IL Richard J. Durbin D (202) 224-2152
IL Mark Kirk R (202) 224-2854
IN Daniel Coats R (202) 224-5623
IN Joe Donnelly D (202) 224-4814
KS Jerry Moran R (202) 224-6521
KS Pat Roberts R (202) 224-4774
KY Mitch McConnell R (202) 224-2541
KY Rand Paul R (202) 224-4343
LA Mary L. Landrieu D (202) 224-5824
LA David Vitter R (202) 224-4623
MA Edward Markey D (202) 224-2742
MA Elizabeth Warren D (202) 224-4543
MD Benjamin L. Cardin D (202) 224-4524
MD Barbara A. Mikulski D (202) 224-4654
ME Susan M. Collins R (202) 224-2523
ME Angus S. King I (202) 224-5344
MI Carl Levin D (202) 224-6221
MI Debbie Stabenow D (202) 224-4822
MN Al Franken D (202) 224-5641
MN Amy Klobuchar D (202) 224-3244
MO Roy Blunt R (202) 224-5721
MO Claire McCaskill D (202) 224-6154
MS Thad Cochran R (202) 224-5054
MS Roger F. Wicker R (202) 224-6253
MT Max Baucus D (202) 224-2651
MT Jon Tester D (202) 224-2644
NC Richard Burr R (202) 224-3154
NC Kay R. Hagan D (202) 224-6342
ND Heidi Heitkamp D (202) 224-2043
ND John Hoeven R (202) 224-2551
NE Deb Fischer R (202) 224-6551
NE Mike Johanns R (202) 224-4224
NH Kelly Ayotte R (202) 224-3324
NH Jeanne Shaheen D (202) 224-2841
NJ Jeff Chiesa R (202) 224-3224
NJ Robert Menendez D (202) 224-4744
NM Martin Heinrich D (202) 224-5521
NM Tom Udall D (202) 224-6621
NV Dean Heller R (202) 224-6244
NV Harry Reid D (202) 224-3542
NY Kirsten E. Gillibrand D (202) 224-4451
NY Charles E. Schumer D (202) 224-6542
OH Sherrod Brown D (202) 224-2315
OH Rob Portman R (202) 224-3353
OK Tom Coburn R (202) 224-5754
OK James M. Inhofe R (202) 224-4721
OR Jeff Merkley D (202) 224-3753
OR Ron Wyden D (202) 224-5244
PA Robert P. Casey D (202) 224-6324
PA Patrick J. Toomey R (202) 224-4254
RI Jack Reed D (202) 224-4642
RI Sheldon Whitehouse D (202) 224-2921
SC Lindsey Graham R (202) 224-5972
SC Tim Scott R (202) 224-6121
SD Tim Johnson D (202) 224-5842
SD John Thune R (202) 224-2321
TN Lamar Alexander R (202) 224-4944
TN Bob Corker R (202) 224-3344
TX John Cornyn R (202) 224-2934
UT Orrin G. Hatch R (202) 224-5251
UT Mike Lee R (202) 224-5444
VA Tim Kaine D (202) 224-4024
VA Mark R. Warner D (202) 224-2023
VT Patrick J. Leahy D (202) 224-4242
VT Bernard Sanders I (202) 224-5141
WA Maria Cantwell D (202) 224-3441
WA Patty Murray D (202) 224-2621
WI Tammy Baldwin D (202) 224-5653
WI Ron Johnson R (202) 224-5323
WV Joe Manchin D (202) 224-3954
WV John D. Rockefeller D (202) 224-6472
WY John Barrasso R (202) 224-6441
WY Michael B. Enzi R (202) 224-3424

Now that we have your attention, you sorry US Senators, keep in mind that we will replace you with those who will gladly correct your errors - - - .

So, scrub and clean by 2014 !

Tick-tock, tick-tock, tick —————

- See more at: http://tedcruzforsenate.org/tell-your-senators-to-oppose-cloture-on-h-j-res-59/#sthash.CvqYzXvd.s4d7EOIg.dpuf
_______________________

TRAITORS:

Orrin Hatch
John Cornyn
Lamar’s caddy
John Thune
Linda Gayham
Tom Coburn
Roy Blunt
B*tch McConnell
Dan Coats
Juan McLame

[BenLurkin]

“‘It’s the law of the land.”

But it does NOT have to be!

[Servant of the Cross]

Opposing Obamacare Isn’t Anarchy

[Bloody Sam Roberts]

Opposing tyranny is Patriotism.

[yldstrk]

The Supreme Court constantly overturns “the law of the land”. It is legal and appropriate to oppose bad law.

[Grampa Dave]

[DaveyB]

Opposing tyranny is Patriotism.

Opposing tyranny is Duty. We owe it to our children and to our founders, we have inherited a legacy and are duty bound to preserve it for our posterity. Freedom isn't free and liberty is often only realized after the tree of liberty has been watered with the blood of patriots.

It burns us all to know that Republican party does believe there are causes worth fighting for even worth dieing for. Surrender is not tactic, getting more traitors elected to the senate is not a strategy. They had both houses and grew and the government, which entitlement did they shut down? There are strong reasons to believe that the GOP cooperated with the IRS to mute the tea-party, that the establishment defamed Bachmann and Cain to clear the path for their own. We are fighting Reid because the GOP covertly sabotaged Angle and I could go on and on. The Establishment GOP is not a friend of liberty, they are the face of the new despots or is that two-faced.

[Gamecock]

‘It’s the law of the land.’

So was slavery.

[Deo volente]

The hypocrisy goes deeper though. Yes, Obamacare is the law of the land. But it is President Obama — who is legally and constitutionally required to faithfully execute the law — and not Republicans who has openly defied it. He has unilaterally and often with no statutory authority opted to waive and delay the parts of the Affordable Care Act that are politically inconvenient to him (or that his administration has been too incompetent to implement).

Time and time again, we've seen that this president doesn't give a whit about the laws of the land. He rules by fiat, the media carries his water for him, and many Republicans in the Congress are too scared of him to do anything about it. He has the Supreme Court safely tucked in his back pocket, and his IRS terrorizes conservatives who dare to disagree with his agenda. We can only hope and pray that this scourge of lawlessness will be lifted soon and our freedom and self-government restored.

[VRW Conspirator]

Liberal: It’s the law of the land.”

Conservative: Obama is not following the law or the constitution.

[CharlesWayneCT]

While this is closer to anarchy than anything the tea partiers have pushed for, anarchy still isn’t the right word for it. Because President Obama still believes people should obey the law of the land — when it pleases him, that is.

Not Anarchy. Totalitarianism. We all exist at the pleasure of the King, who is the law, and even then is only partially bound by his own proclamations.

[Walleye_Walter]

As was prohibition!

Guess where we would be today if they were still the “Law of the Land”?

[Stand Watch Listen]

Worth repeating...with empahsis...

"..But it is President Obama — who is legally and constitutionally required to faithfully execute the law — and not Republicans who has openly defied it. He has unilaterally and often with no statutory authority opted to waive and delay the parts of the Affordable Care Act that are politically inconvenient to him (or that his administration has been too incompetent to implement)."

Seems this Administration is not only guilty of all avoidance of all transparency, but has continued to cherry pick only the favorable (???) aspects of this Act. The selective revisionist memory of this Administration knows no bounds. Seems that segments of this 'law' were and continued to be unilaterally and arbitrarily executed. Then it is simply grossly discriminating against a large part of the populace. Either this 'law' is to be executed in its totality or to be ignored and ruled unvalid/unconstitutional.

[DaveyB]

Is it anarchy to fail to enforce emigration laws?
Is it anarchy to pass a tax bill that originates in the senate?
Is it anarchy to make recess appointments when congress is still in session?
Is it anarchy to refuse to quell voter intimidation?
Is it anarchy to use the IRS to quite dissent?
Is it anarchy to jail a man for a film, to cover an arms deal and attack on an embassy?
Is it anarchy to give waivers to your campaign contributors without legal authority of law?
Is it anarchy to sign a treaty without senate consent?

Or it is just plain high crimes and misdemeanors?

[Pecos]

And if they tell me the Supreme Court upheld it, I remind them of the Dredd Scott case.

[Wurlitzer]

Maybe a little Anarchy can be a good thing.

Does anyone really think Anarchy would kill more than governments have in all recorded history?

Does anyone, not a progressive/communist/Marxist/Democrat/traitor (completely interchangeable names) think our little Anarchy against the British a few centuries ago was a bad thing?

Hell the damned country is founded on the concept of WE THE PEOPLE holding the majority of power and NOT government. Is that not a little bit of Anarchy?

[VRW Conspirator]

Is it anarchy to...

bump

[HiTech RedNeck]

As long as “repeal” is a legal thing to do at all... of course it cannot be “anarchy”... what we have here is a gruesome example of what worship of all manner of things that aren’t God, is like.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Kennedy kicked the ball down the road. Calling it a tax, that will require somebody to actually BE taxed under the program in order to generate the basis for challenging it in court as being an illegal tax. My guess is that the Obamadmin will try to keep that from happening until the next presidential election.