Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ge0ffrey

I think they’ve tried to back away from it, but the damage has been done.

Relying on less than 3% of the population is not a sound marketing strategy unless that less than 3% happens to be incredibly wealthy. Even then, it’s dicey.


3 posted on 09/27/2013 8:54:34 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Refuse; Resist; Rebel; Revolt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Arm_Bears
"I think they’ve tried to back away from it, but the damage has been done."

Plus, the last time I was in JCPenney, their shirts looked like they were designed by gays.

8 posted on 09/27/2013 8:58:09 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears
Relying on less than 3% of the population is not a sound marketing strategy unless that less than 3% happens to be incredibly wealthy. Even then, it’s dicey.

It's never just the 3% to whom they are marketing. You have to also include the friends, relatives and leftards that support and promote sodomy. However, they are still running the risk of pissing off more people than they please. All of Gay C. Penney's wounds are self-inflicted.

9 posted on 09/27/2013 8:58:16 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears

Heck, I doubt the incredibly wealthy would be caught dead in a place like JC Penney. They might encounter regular people.


10 posted on 09/27/2013 8:58:34 AM PDT by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears

did they try? I doubt it


12 posted on 09/27/2013 9:00:49 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears

“I think they’ve tried to back away from it, but the damage has been done.”

It’s not like they weren’t warned. There were plenty of us making calls and sending e-mails. They had time to turn it around and chose not to. Too bad. I think Penneys and Sears were our first foray into credit.


17 posted on 09/27/2013 9:05:41 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears
Relying on less than 3% of the population is not a sound marketing strategy unless that less than 3% happens to be incredibly wealthy.

Gays do tend to be wealthier than the average population. Also, I may be stereotyping here; but, I wouldn't think that J.C. Pennys would be the store that gays would be flocking to for their shopping needs anyway.

22 posted on 09/27/2013 9:07:39 AM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears
Relying on less than 3% of the population is not a sound marketing strategy unless that less than 3% happens to be incredibly wealthy

No gay man worth his Dolce and Gabbna wardrobe would be caught dead shopping at Penny's. Those ads were not made for the gays. They were made to persuade middle class hausfraus that shopping at Penny's is hip.

24 posted on 09/27/2013 9:11:22 AM PDT by Poison Pill (Take your silver lining and SHOVE IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears

>>>I think they’ve tried to back away from it, but the damage has been done.

Relying on less than 3% of the population is not a sound marketing strategy unless that less than 3% happens to be incredibly wealthy. Even then, it’s dicey.<<<

Even if the 3% are incredibly wealthy they won’t be shopping at JC Penney, anyway.

Offending the vast majority of your customers, to cater to a handfull of deviants just doesn’t seem like a great strategy.


32 posted on 09/27/2013 9:17:42 AM PDT by Above My Pay Grade (The people have the right to tell government what guns it may possess, not the other way around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Arm_Bears

I’m waiting on the FReepers to post that J.C. Penney isn’t having problems because of its open support for gays. Yet. It’s pretty clear to me that it’s stupid business to piss off just about any portion of a company’s clientele by taking a potentially unpopular public stand. So maybe the gay ads only cost J.C. Penney 1 or 2% of their business. Who really knows, but I can tell you this, me and mine used to buy there and we don’t do so anymore. Why? Because of their corporate cheer leading for the sodomites.

This is what I don’t understand. Exactly how many customers did J.C. Penney think they were going to get by advertising to homosexuals? Were there droves of homosexuals out there who were not shopping at J.C. Penney? Here we are in the midst a culture war, and some businesses want to take sides? The stupid. It BURNS!


48 posted on 09/27/2013 9:34:04 AM PDT by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson